Lawyer sues Morgan & Morgan over firm's 'deceptive' ad practices
By Sara Merken
July 18 (Reuters) -An Arkansas lawyer has sued Morgan & Morgan, a national plaintiffs law firm known for its energetic marketing, accusing it of unfair and deceptive advertising practices that harm his own business.
Morgan & Morgan runs advertisements with "dramatizations" and testimonials from clients in violation of state attorney professional conduct rules, personal injury lawyer Jody Shackelford alleged in the lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Arkansas federal court.
The Arkansas television ads include disclaimers such as "DRAMATIZATION" and "ACTUAL CLIENT," which mislead consumers by falsely suggesting that they comply with the local rules, the complaint said.
Orlando, Florida-based Morgan & Morgan's broadcast of the commercials also violated Federal Communications Commission rules preventing false or misleading advertising, the complaint said.
Morgan & Morgan has as a result retained Arkansas clients, "diverting potential clients from Arkansas attorneys and law firms" and giving the firm an unfair advantage, Shackelford said in the lawsuit.
Morgan & Morgan spokesperson Dave Falkenstein said in a statement the lawsuit "is meritless and will be dismissed."
Shackelford, who works at a two-lawyer firm, told Reuters it can be difficult to compete with such a big firm, which he said is "stepping on the little guys."
Morgan & Morgan spent nearly $240 million in TV ads in 2023, and $40.3 million in digital ads that year, according to a February blog post from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform that cited data from advertisement analytics firms Tunnl and Sensor Tower.
Micah Buchdahl, a New Jersey-based ethics attorney who focuses on law firm marketing and advertising, said Morgan & Morgan's marketing approach has affected personal injury and other law firms around the country. In some cases they have had to "really advertise heavily" for the first time to compete against the firm, he said.
Morgan & Morgan faced a lawsuit in Pennsylvania in 2017 from personal injury firm that claimed its local ads were misleading consumers about the firm's work in the state. Morgan & Morgan asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit, and the case was dropped in 2018.
The case is Shackelford v. Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Service PA, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, No. 3:24-cv-00123-JM
For Shackelford: Pro se
For Morgan & Morgan: Not immediately known
Reporting by Sara Merken
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
