美國居民不適用 XM 服務。

UK's under-fire water industry braced for regulatory showdown



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UK's under-fire water industry braced for regulatory showdown</title></head><body>

Regulator to set out level of permitted bill increases

Companies say bill hikes needed to upgrade infrastructure

Critics argue companies have under-invested for decades

By Sarah Young and Marc Jones

LONDON, July 10 (Reuters) -Britain's under-fire water companies are braced for a reckoning when the industry's regulator on Thursday sets out the level of bill increases they will be permitted, amid public outrage over rising costs and worsening pollution.

The trade-off between price hikes, investment and the environment will test the country's new Labour government, and will illustrate the challenges of managing the privatised water industry, particularly as Thames Water - the biggest supplier - teeters on the brink of collapse.

Water companies have routinely released sewage into rivers and seas, which have made Britain's waters increasingly dirty in the last five years, putting the regulator, Ofwat, under intense pressure to act.

It will publish its initial decision on how much the dozen or so water companies can charge customers for the 2025-2030 period before a final decision in December.

Ofwat said Thames has asked for a 44% increase in bills over the period, excluding inflation, while other providers have sought varying amounts, from Southern Water's 73% hike to Severn Trent's 36% rise and United Utilities' UU.L 25% rise.

The companies say the bill hikes are needed to upgrade ageing pipe networks and help accommodate a growing UK population, and say more frequent droughts and storms have helped cause sewage spills.

But critics of the industry, privatised in 1989, argue that the companies have under-invested for decades while taking out billions of pounds in dividends for shareholders and paying large bonuses to executives.

"We want the water bill payer protected and for essential infrastructure funding to come from investors and lenders who have, until now, profited from pollution," James Wallace, CEO of environmental group River Action UK, said in an emailed response to a Reuters request for comment.

TOUGH LINE

While the government might publicly want the regulator to take a tough line on the water companies, it also needs investors onside as newly elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer seeks tens of billions of pounds of private investment to upgrade infrastructure and revive Britain's economic growth.

The new government is setting up a National Wealth Fund which wants to attract private investment, to the tune of three pounds of private money for every pound from public funds, for clean energy and other projects.

Thames Water, which supplies a quarter of Britain's population, has a 15 billion pound ($19 billion) debt pile and is at risk of collapse next year unless it can convince reluctant shareholders, bond investors plus new investors to stump up more cash.

"Thames is a high profile asset and if Thames isn't dealt with carefully then that could influence investor sentiment," said Nalaka De Silva, head of private market solutions at fund manager abrdn.

"What they need to do is basically convey a message that the policy and regulatory environment is stable."

A Thames collapse could spook investors in the water sector as well as further afield in regulated sectors like energy where Britain also needs investment.

In 2019, Ofwat agreed a plan for average water bills to fall by 12% before inflation over the five years.

But since then, both inflation and interest rates have jumped, making price rises in the next period all but inevitable to allow investors to make returns.

A number of major international funds have already sold out of Thames bonds in recent months, filings data shows, after its parent company Kemble Water defaulted in April amid a standoff with shareholders over providing more equity.

Some investors blame Ofwat for allowing the crisis at Thames to develop.

"It completely degrades the whole system of regulation," said one major investor who asked to remain anonymous having recently sold out of Thames. "It has left a very sour taste".


($1 = 0.7814 pounds)


thames water company circling the drain https://reut.rs/4eSq2je

Thames Water's assets are older than those of UK peers https://reut.rs/3TJb0mg


Reporting by Sarah Young and Marc Jones; Editing by David Holmes

</body></html>

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明