Autodesk left a door ajar for its pushy investor
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, June 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Autodesk ADSK.O left its shaky foundation exposed. The $50 bln firm, which develops design software for engineers and architects, has drawn the ire of shareholder rabble-rouser Starboard Value over how and when it disclosed shifts in billing practices. Suspect financial goals and associated executive pay are a tempting activist target. The bigger problem is that this opens a path for Starboard to attack longer-running underperformance.
The company has an enviable niche serving industry-standard applications. Part of that lock-in was down to pushing up-front, multi-year contracts, but customers demanded discounts in exchange for this inflexibility. So, in 2022, management said it would switch to annual billing.
That didn’t quite work out: in the next fiscal year, Autodesk pursued long-term contracts to help meet its free cash flow goals. Along with revenue, that’s a key metric for determining executives’ performance-based equity payouts.
Snag is, investors weren’t told about the switch-up. Autodesk only disclosed an investigation into its practices in April, roughly a week after the window to nominate dissident members to its board had closed. Starboard is suing in Delaware to reopen that window, charging that shareholders were bamboozled.
The company says that there’s no issue, since its investigation didn’t lead to any financial restatements, and claims that the changes weren’t engineered to boost pay. Whatever the case, the actual issue at stake underneath all this is much simpler: Autodesk’s performance. While revenue has more than doubled over five years, profitability is weak. The company’s net margin was 16% last year, compared to 22% at rival Ansys ANSS.O. Add it all together, and Autodesk trades at 27 times estimated earnings over the next 12 months, according to LSEG, a near-20% discount to Ansys.
Starboard’s suggestions are standard fare: cut costs, refrain from silly acquisitions, and return capital to investors. A 6% rise in Autodesk’s shares suggests the market agrees. But what really offers a wedge for Starboard now is the investigation. Activists repeatedly home in on ersatz financial metrics, especially when tied to pay. Look at RB Global RBA.TO, where activist Luxor Capital stood opposite Starboard over a major acquisition, arguing that executives were unduly rewarded for chasing big-ticket deals. About half of activist campaigns surveyed by consultancy Semler Brossy involve gripes about incentive pay. Autodesk may have stood on unsound financial ground for a while, but it’s the specter of disputed rewards sitting atop it that could really encourage activists to dig their teeth in.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Starboard Value said in a letter dated June 17 that it had taken a stake of over $500 million in Autodesk and had filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery to compel the software company to delay its 2024 annual meeting and reopen nominations for its board of directors. The shareholder activist said Autodesk had withheld material information from shareholders ahead of the nomination deadline, and suggested several changes in how the company should be run. The board nomination window closed on March 23.
The news follows Autodesk's April 1 announcement that it would not file its annual report in time, and that the board of directors had begun an internal investigation regarding the company’s free cash flow and non-GAAP operating margin practices. The company subsequently said on May 31 that there would be no restatement of GAAP or non-GAAP financials.
Editing by Jonathan Guilford and Pranav Kiran
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
