Exxon’s dominance may not be good for Exxon
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, Aug 2 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Exxon Mobil XOM.N is barging ahead of rival Chevron CVX.N. Second-quarter figures reported on Friday showed the $520 billion oil giant churned out $9.2 billion of profit, thanks to the benefits of its $60 billion deal for Pioneer Natural Resources and record production in oil fields in Texas and offshore South America. The company run by Darren Woods is growing its dominance, but that has risks, too. It could use friends at home and abroad, and it’s punishing its biggest potential ally.
The company’s production has two gems. Output from the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico is now 1.2 million barrels of oil equivalent a day, or over three times as much as it produced three years ago, thanks to higher production from legacy acreage, and output added from its deal, which closed in May. Exxon also said cost cuts, previously estimated at $2 billion a year, were exceeding expectations. Likewise, production from the nation of Guyana exceeded 630,000 barrels per day, roughly five times as much as three years ago.
Chevron is both smaller, pumping 1.1 million fewer barrels per day, and posted slower growth than Exxon. While rising production in Texas helped, problems in Australia didn’t. The bigger snag is its $53 billion deal for Hess. Chevron, which is moving its headquarters from California to Texas, is gunning for a stake in the same Guyana oilfield as Exxon. But that deal is in arbitration thanks to an arrangement Exxon claims gives it the right of first refusal. The resolution of that dispute is set to drag into the spring of 2025, at the earliest, giving Chevron’s biggest rival another year to make its life difficult,while also getting ahead.
While growing dominance in the rapidly consolidating U.S. oil industry sounds appealing, parts of that could work against Exxon’s long-term interest. Oil’s popularity is already limited in Washington, and while that could change in November if Republican nominee Donald Trump is elected, views on antitrust are still nuanced. The more Exxon is seen as the goliath, the less sympathy it may glean.
Plus U.S. oil companies compete against the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, where jurisdictions work together. A bigger Exxon is still a minnow compared to OPEC producers like Saudi Aramco, which pumps out twice as much daily. In any global showdown, a strong U.S. rival is probably a useful Exxon ally.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Chevron said on Aug. 2 that revenue for the second quarter was $51.2 billion, an increase of 5% from the same period last year. The oil company’s earnings fell 26% to $4.4 billion.
The same day, Exxon Mobil said revenue was $93.1 billion, an increase of 12% from the same quarter a year ago. The company’s earnings rose 17% to $9.2 billion.
Chevron said on July 31 that an arbitration meeting over Hess’ Guyana assets has been pushed back until May 2025. Chevron agreed to buy Hess in October in a $53 billion deal. Exxon and CNOOC challenged that deal, saying they had a right of first refusal to Hess’ 30% stake in an offshore Guyana oilfield under a joint-operating agreement. Chevron and Hess say this is not the case.
Under the current agreement, Exxon owns a 45% stake and China’s CNOOC 25%.
“This matter is too important to rush through – all relevant facts and circumstances must be taken into consideration, and this will take time," said an Exxon spokesperson.
Graphic: Exxon's shares have outperformed Chevron's https://reut.rs/3WybcpO
Editing by Lauren Silva Laughlin and Sharon Lam
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
