Judge slashes $185 mln award for law firm Quinn Emanuel in US healthcare case
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 10 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday cut in half a $185 million legal fee payout for Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, awarding the law firm $92.4 million for its work on a multibillion-dollar federal healthcare insurance case.
Judge Kathryn Davis of the U.S. Federal Claims Court said the reduced amount was a reasonable reward for Quinn Emanuel, a top U.S. business litigation firm.
Quinn was awarded $185 million for its work on the case in 2021,but a federal appeals court last year struck down the award as excessive and ordered Davis to reconsider it.
Davis on Thursday found the 900-lawyer firm's hours were "improperly inflated and must be reduced."
Quinn Emanuel had urged the judge at a hearing in July to again approve the firm’s $185 million fee. A group of health insurers led by UnitedHealthcare and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan opposed the fee amount, calling it “astronomical.”
Quinn Emanuel, UnitedHealthcare and Kaiser did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In the underlying case, Quinn Emanuel secured a $3.7 billion judgment in 2020 for a class of insurers that said the Obama administration failed to meet its obligations under an Obamacare provision aimed at encouraging medical coverage to uninsured Americans.
The $185 million fee amounted to 5% of the judgment fund. Quinn Emanuel had defended the award as justified based on the novelty of the case and the risk the firm took in pursuing the litigation. The firm said it had sunk about 10,000 hours into the litigation.
UnitedHealthcare and Kaiser told Davis that the request translated to more than $18,000 an hour for Quinn Emanuel. Top partners at the Los Angeles-founded firm often bill between $1,500 and $2,000 an hour, court records show.
A lawyer for the insurers, Moe Keshavarzi of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, had urged Davis to approve a fee award no larger than about $11 million to $23 million.
Davis said the objectors' proposed fee was "so low as to disincentivize attorneys from pursuing class actions."
The new fee award amounts to 2.5% of the judgment fund, Davis wrote. She credited the firm for developing what she said was "the novel, winning legal theory" underpinning the litigation.
Quinn Emanuel has told Davis that it already distributed the $185 million within the firm and that it obtained insurance on the award.
The case is Health Republic Insurance Co v United States, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, No. 1:16-cv-00259.
For Health Republic: Adam Wolfson and Andrew Schapiro of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan
For class objectors: Moe Keshavarzi of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Read more:
Legal Fee Tracker: Quinn Emanuel fights to keep $185 million award in Obamacare case
Health insurers slam renewed $185 million fee bid by Quinn Emanuel
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
