Texas attorney general sues insulin makers and pharmacy middlemen over high costs
Adds OptumRx, Cigna and Sanofi responses in paragraphs 11-15
Oct 3 (Reuters) -The Texas attorney general has sued leading insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), accusing them of collaborating to inflate the cost of insulin.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office said on Thursday it had sued insulin makers Eli Lilly LLY.N, Novo Nordisk NOVOb.CO and Sanofi SASY.PA.
The office had also sued PBMs, including CVS' CVS.N Caremark, Cigna's CI.N Express Scripts, and UnitedHealth's UNH.N OptumRx, who act as intermediaries in negotiating drug prices and coverage.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
The lawsuit targets both insulin manufacturers and PBMs. The previous action by U.S. antitrust regulators only targeted PBMs.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, in September, sued the same PBMs, accusing them of steering diabetes patients towards higher-priced insulin in order to secure millions of dollars in rebates from pharmaceutical companies.
At that time, the FTC had not sued the insulin manufacturers, but had criticized their role in what it called a broken system.
CONTEXT
In the Texas lawsuit, Paxton accused that manufacturers artificially raised the prices of insulin and then paid a significant, undisclosed portion back to the PBMs for preferential treatment in return.
The PBMs subsequently awarded preferred status to the manufacturer with the highest list prices, while excluding lower-priced drugs, the press release from the attorney general's office said.
KEY QUOTE
"Big Pharma insulin manufacturers and PBMs worked together to take advantage of diabetes patients and drive prices as high as they could," said Paxton.
"Allegations that we play any role in determining the prices charged by manufacturers for their products are false, and we intend to vigorously defend against this baseless suit," CVS said inan emailed statement.
"This lawsuit is without merit and ignores the reality of the current market," UnitedHealth's OptumRx said.
While Cigna did not provide a direct comment, the company redirected Reuters to its Sept. 20 statement , where it said the action filed by the FTC related to insulin pricing is demonstrably baseless.
"Novo Nordisk believes that the allegations in the lawsuit are meritless, and we intend to vigorously defend against these claims," a company spokesperson told Reuters.
"While we will not comment on the specifics of the allegations, Sanofi's pricing practices have always complied with the law," the French drugmaker said in an emailed statement.
Lilly did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Reporting by Puyaan Singh and Mariam Sunny in Bengaluru; Editing by Mohammed Safi Shamsi
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
