Hindi nagbibigay ng serbisyo ang XM sa mga residente ng Estados Unidos.

Sustainable Switch: What a Trump win would mean for clean energy



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Sustainable Switch: What a Trump win would mean for clean energy</title></head><body>

Sept 3 -By Sharon Kimathi

Energy and ESG Editor, Reuters Digital

sharon.kimathi@thomsonreuters.com


Hello!

Today's newsletter tackles three key questions about the U.S. elections and clean energy: What would a Donald Trump presidency mean for climate and energy policies? What is Joe Biden's energy legacy? And what to expect from Kamala Harris if she becomes president.

It seems Trump would rescind many of President Biden's clean energy rules while also speeding approvals of power plants to meet rising U.S. electricity demand.

One of the most significant rollbacks would be removing the U.S. from the Paris agreement on climate change as Trump did during his 2017-2021 White House term.

But what about Biden's presidency? What is his climate and energy legacy?

U.S. oil and gas production hit the highest levels of any country ever, despite his administration's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which contains hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for clean energy such as wind, solar, hydrogen, geothermal projects.


Axing clean energy laws

Should Trump win the Nov. 5 election, his campaign said he would axe clean energy regulations of Biden and his Democrat opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, on both power plants and vehicle emissions.

Those rules are aimed at slashing carbon emissions from the power industry while also pushing the auto industry to transition to electric cars to cut tailpipe pollution.

Trump "will immediately stop all Biden-Harris policies that distort energy markets, limit consumer choice and drive up the costs on consumers on day one," David Bernhardt, his former Interior Department secretary, told reporters in a call organized by the campaign.


New power plants

Bernhardt said Trump would also implement rapid approvals for energy projects and "the construction of hundreds of new power plants," without detailing how those would be fueled.

Trump would "modernize" the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to speed approvals for new nuclear plants and for existing ones to have their lives extended, Bernhardt said..

"There's been legislation to address some of these issues, but there's a long way to go".

In April, Biden's Environmental Protection Agency finalized rules targeting carbon, air and water pollution from power plants. These will effectively require coal-fired power plants and new natural gas-fired generators in the coming decade to capture emissions.


Not ban fracking

In response to Trump’s proposed policy rollbacks, James Singer, a Harris campaign spokesperson, said the Republican candidate wants to sell out the country’s energy future to Big Oil executives and that under Biden and Harris, "American energy of all kinds has hit record production levels, resulting in hundreds of thousands of new jobs for American workers because of her leadership."

And what about Harris?

Just last week, the Democratic presidential candidate told CNN that she would not ban fracking if elected president.

"As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking," Harris said.


Talking Points

  • At least 13 people have died in the Philippines due to tropical storm Yagi, while schools and government offices were closed in Manila and nearby provinces on Tuesday because of expected bad weather.

  • French oil major TotalEnergies has signed a $100 million deal to help preserve U.S. forests. The agreement with partners Anew Climate and Aurora Sustainable Lands calls for the reduction of timber harvesting across 300,000 hectares in 10 states.

    • The number of fires in Brazil's Amazon rainforest region for the month of August surged to the highest level since 2010, government data showed, after a record drought that has been plaguing the biome.

    • Volkswagen is considering closing factories in Germany for the first time, in a move that shows the mounting pressure Europe's top carmaker faces from Asian rivals.

    In Conversation

    Frank Altman, founder of Community Reinvestment Fund, a U.S.-based community development financial institution, shares his thoughts on the anti-environment, social and governance (ESG) movement:

    “Anti-ESG rhetoric is on the rise in the United States, and it is simply wrong.

    “The effort to combat climate change must include investors who want to own stocks in companies that are responding responsibly to the climate challenges we are facing.

    “Industries that are responsible for carbon emissions are fueling this backlash in order to maintain their inclusion in investment funds.

    “A recent article in the San Francisco Chronicle pointed out that most participants in 401(k) and 403(b) retirement plans are forced to invest in carbon-emitting firms as part of indexed funds.

    “Those who seek to ban consideration of ESG factors in investment decisions are simply removing choice from investors.

    “These retirement plans should include options for plan participants to make their own choices regarding ESG investments.

    “The same concept of allowing investors choices applies to companies engaged in the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) movement.

    “The American population is growing more diverse daily, and it makes good business sense to serve this diverse market. DEI and excellence go hand in hand.”

    ESG Lens

    Last week, I highlighted the green backlash affecting European politics as Germany’s far-right AfD party is trying to pick up rural voters who oppose the growth of wind energy.

    This week, the AfD was a big winner of the German state vote that dealt a heavy blow to the parties in Chancellor Olaf Scholz's government, securing 33.2% in Thuringia in its first regional election, and also gaining almost as many votes as the conservatives in Saxony.

    ESG Spotlight

    Today’s spotlight shines a light on the positive developments after authorities in Brazil cleaned up their waters.

    Sea turtles in the Guanabara Bay of Rio de Janeiro are getting healthier after struggling for years with a tumor disease that ultimately leads to their death.

    Scientists said this came after authorities made an effort to clean up the water of the natural harbor. Research has linked fibropapillomatosis, a benign tumor in sea turtles, to both a virus and environmental factors.

    Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also subscribe here.


    The far-right AfD did well in two Germany state elections https://reut.rs/4g6zXCx


    Editing by Alexander Smith

    </body></html>

Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.

Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.

Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.

Babala sa Risk: Maaaring malugi ang iyong kapital. Maaaring hindi nababagay sa lahat ang mga produktong naka-leverage. Mangyaring isaalang-alang ang aming Pahayag sa Risk.