Silicon Valley daredevils ride or die with Trump
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
NEW YORK, July 17 (Reuters Breakingviews) -When Steve Jobs paid tribute to “the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers” he was thinking Muhammad Ali and Pablo Picasso, who featured in a 1997 Apple AAPL.O ad campaign. Squint, and it’s possible to see how former U.S. President Donald Trump would fit the mold and appeal to a Silicon Valley crowd that exalts those who “have no respect for the status quo.” The flaw in the logic, setting aside that being born into wealth and having Wall Street’s blessing hardly qualify for radical outsider status, is that the stakes in politics are much higher than in sports, art or even investing.
Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, who started their eponymous venture capital firm 15 years ago, became the latest technology whizzes to throw their support behind the onetime reality TV star’s repeat run at the White House. Tesla TSLA.O boss Elon Musk also backed Trump, joining fellow PayPal PYPL.O alum David Sacks, the Craft Ventures founder who fumed on Tuesday at the Republican National Convention about President Joe Biden’s “demented policy.” Sequoia Capital partners Doug Leone and Shaun Maguire are in Trump’s corner, as are Palantir Technologies PLTR.N co-founder Joe Lonsdale and Social Capital CEO Chamath Palihapitiya. Cryptocurrency investors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss have contributed to the campaign, too.
There may be ideological alignment involved, but naked self-interest and a bias toward contrarian thinking also probably play a part. Choosing Senator JD Vance, who has worked in venture capital, to be on the ticket as vice president inevitably helps. Tech entrepreneurs historically have had libertarian tendencies but also been more in sync with Democrats when it comes to social issues such as same-sex marriage, abortion and gun control. In 2016, 75% of tech entrepreneurs supported Hillary Clinton and just 9% backed Trump, one study found.
Andreessen and Horowitz, whose firm manages some $42 billion, say they are single-issue voters focused exclusively on tech startups. To that end, Andreessen cites a Biden executive order that limits the amount of computing power in artificial intelligence models as a potential precursor to another “reign of terror” like the one he perceives has been waged on blockchain and crypto initiatives. Ending Big Tech monopolies, an idea where Vance and the Biden administration are in agreement, would encourage smaller firms to roll out new products and services in Andreessen’s view. He also railed against the administration’s ill-conceived proposal to impose a 25% tax on unrealized capital gains, which he argues would kill his industry.
By contrast, the recently unveiled Republican Party manifesto under Trump vows to end digital currency crackdowns, repeal Biden’s AI edict and cut taxes. This and more of the platform undoubtedly looks attractive in Silicon Valley. Musk has used the X social media service he owns – sometimes amplifying misinformation – to crusade against the “woke mind virus” and illegal immigration, which hew to Trump’s positions. Leone pointed to growing U.S. budget deficits and foreign policy “missteps” to explain his decision.
This harmonic convergence make sense, but only in a vacuum. Trump is a convicted felon guilty of falsifying business records and sexual assault. From a policy perspective, the Republican nominee champions higher tariffs and mass deportations, which threaten bad economic outcomes, including for the tech industry, which relies heavily on capital and goods from overseas. Abandoning allies by exiting NATO, while ending support for Ukraine and Taiwan – as Trump has indicated he might do – also is bound to create harmful unintended consequences by empowering Russia and China.
Tech entrepreneurs often succeed by defying conventions, and therefore see value and opportunity in those who would dare to do the same. They also fail 90% of the time, with a downside mostly limited to misallocating other people’s capital. The other 10% can more than make up for the losses anyway. When it comes to public policy, the fallout is often wider and more destructive. In Apple’s renowned ad, Jobs concluded that the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do. Unstated is that the change, especially when it involves the occupant of the Oval Office, isn’t often what it’s cracked up to be.
Follow @jgfarb on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz said on a July 16 podcast that they are backing Donald Trump to be U.S. president because they think he helps their agenda of supporting startups.
Graphic: Venture capitalists rethink their political funding https://reut.rs/3Lt6FzP
Editing by Lauren Silva Laughlin and Sharon Lam
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
