Ray-Ban maker EssilorLuxottica slams ‘grab bag’ lawsuits claiming eyewear monopoly
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 3 (Reuters) -Eyewear giant EssilorLuxottica has asked a U.S. judge to throw out what it called “misguided” consumer lawsuits accusing the Ray-Ban maker of monopolizing markets for designer frames and prescription lenses, causing customers to pay higher prices.
In a court filing, EssilorLuxottica on Wednesday told U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in Manhattan that the consumer plaintiffs had not presented enough facts to justify their claims that the company and affiliated entities were violating U.S. antitrust law.
A series of lawsuits first filed last year and later consolidated in Manhattan alleged EssilorLuxottica used serial acquisitions of rivals and restrictive sales and distribution agreements to unlawfully dominate markets for eye products.
“Their claims amount to nothing more than a contention that building a successful company over many decades is unlawful,” EssilorLuxottica’s court filing said. It added: “That is not an antitrust violation; it is good business.”
Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and neither did EssilorLuxottica and its attorneys.
Italian eyewear giant Luxottica in 2018 merged with French lens maker Essilor in a $58 billion deal, forming EssilorLuxottica.
EssilorLuxottica owns major retail outlets including LensCrafters, Sunglasses Hut and For Eyes, and also popular eyewear brands such as Persol, Oliver Peoples, and Oakley.
Two related lawsuits seek class action status for buyers who purchased products from EssilorLuxottica and related business entities and who indirectly bought items through third-parties such as optometrists.
The plaintiffs said EssilorLuxottica had formed a web of anticompetitive agreements providing consumers only “an illusion of choice in a competition-free ecosystem.”
EssilorLuxottica captured more than half of the nearly $8.5 billion U.S. retail market for premium eyewear, the consumers alleged.
In its bid to dismiss the lawsuit, EssilorLuxottica said it and its affiliated companies operated in a highly competitive industry, and that the plaintiffs’ “grab bag” of antitrust claims failed to allege that the company was excluding potential rivals.
New market entrants like Warby Parker “have quickly built substantial eyewear businesses under their own new brands,” EssilorLuxottica said.
In re Eyewear Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-04826-MKV-GS.
For direct purchasers: Daniel Gustafson of Gustafson Gluek; David Cialkowski of Zimmerman Reed; Heidi Silton of Lockridge Grindal Nauen; and Alec Schultz of Hilgers Graben
For indirect purchasers: Richard Paul III and Laura Fellows of Paul LLP
For defendants: Christopher Yates, Belinda Lee and Lawrence Buterman of Latham & Watkins
Read more:
EssilorLuxottica extends smart glasses partnership with Meta
Ray-Ban maker Luxottica accused of anti-union behavior at U.S. Georgia plant
EU, U.S clear Essilor's 48 billion euro merger with Luxottica
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
