Bacardi wins appeal reviving US Trademark Office fight over 'Havana Club' rum
Updates June 13 story with comment from Cubaexport in paragraph 5, attorney information in case caption
By Blake Brittain
June 13 (Reuters) -Bacardi [RIC:RIC:BACLTD.UL] convinced a U.S. appeals court on Thursday to revive the liquor giant's lawsuit against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in its long-running dispute with the Cuban government over "Havana Club" rum.
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, determined that Bacardi can challenge in federal court the USPTO's decision to renew Cuba's "Havana Club" trademark 10 years after Bacardi said it should have expired.
A spokesperson for the USPTO declined to comment. A Bacardi spokesperson said that the company was pleased with the decision.
Cuba-owned Cubaexport and French spirits company Pernod Ricard PERP.PA sell Havana Club rum outside of the United States. Cubaexport first registered the Havana Club trademark in the U.S. in 1976.
Cubaexport's attorney David Bernstein of Debevoise & Plimpton said in a statement that the company is "confident that the renewal was valid and that the court will agree when it reaches the merits of this dispute."
Bacardi, which was exiled from Cuba after the Cuban Revolution, says the Cuban government unlawfully seized the Havana Club name and assets from Jose Arechabala SA in 1960. Bacardi bought Jose Arechabala's brand and began selling Havana Club rum in the United States in 1995.
Bacardi argued in a 2021 lawsuit in Virginia that Cubaexport's trademark should have expired in 2006 after it failed to get a license to pay its renewal fee from the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Bacardi's lawsuit challenged the USPTO's 2016 decision to renew Cubaexport's trademark after OFAC changed course and issued the license. U.S. District Judge Liam O'Grady dismissed the case in 2022, finding that Bacardi could only challenge the mark through trademark office procedures.
But U.S. Circuit Judge Allison Rushing wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel on Thursday that Bacardi's court challenge can continue.
Rushing said that federal law does not disallow lawsuits over the USPTO's trademark-renewal decisions even though it may preclude court complaints over the office's registration decisions.
Bacardi has filed a separate lawsuit over the USPTO's rejection of its request to cancel Cubaexport's trademark, which is still pending.
The case is Bacardi & Co v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-1659.
For Bacardi: David Zionts of Covington & Burling; Michael Lynch and Damon Suden of Kelley Drye & Warren
For the PTO: Nicholas Crown of the U.S. Department of Justice
Read more:
Bacardi demands U.S. explain giving Havana Club brand to Cuba
Bacardi sues USPTO over renewal of Cuban 'Havana Club' trademark
U.S. trademark agency beats Bacardi lawsuit over Cuba's 'Havana Club'
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
