Baby bottle maker says microplastics inescapable, health risks unproven, in bid to toss lawsuit
By Diana Novak Jones
Sept 9 (Reuters) -Handi-Craft Co on Friday pushed back against claims that the company failed to warn parents that their plastic baby bottles leach microplastics when heated, arguing in part that microplastics are ubiquitous and their health effects are unproven.
Handi-Craft and another baby bottle maker, Philips North America, are each facing proposed class actions claiming they failed to warn parents that the polypropylene bottles and cups sold under the brands Philips Avent and Handi-Craft’s Dr. Brown's, when heated as part of regular use, could expose infants to tiny flecks of plastic that can interfere with their digestive, reproductive and immune systems. Both companies have moved to dismiss the claims against them.
In its motion to dismiss, Handi-Craft argued that the consumers suing hadn’t dealt with “the intractable problem of assigning liability when microplastics are so ubiquitous and ‘inescapable’ that humans constantly ingest and inhale them from countless sources.”
The attorneys representing the consumers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did representatives of Philips North America or Handi-Craft Company.
The consumers, who are California residents, filed the parallel lawsuits against Philips and Handi-Craft in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in June. The plaintiffs, who hope to represent both classes covering California purchasers and nationwide purchasers of the products, are seeking damages and an injunction barring the sale of the products and marketing that implies they are safe.
In its motion to dismiss, filed on Sept. 3, Philips argued that the plaintiffs had failed to quantify how many microplastics the bottles supposedly leach or whether that amount could be dangerous.
Handi-Craft is also asking the judge overseeing its case to strike some of the claims for the nationwide class, arguing in part that state laws governing consumer products are too different for them to proceed as a nationwide class.
The cases are Miller et al v. Philips North America LLC, case number 3:24-cv-03781, and Cortez et al v. Handi-Craft Company Inc, case number 4:24-cv-03782, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
For the plaintiffs: Ryan Clarkson, Bahar Sodaify, Kelsey Elling and Alan Gudino of the Clarkson Law Firm.
For Philips: Cortlin Lannin, Megan Rodgers and Raymond Lu of Covington & Burling.
For Handi-Craft: IJay Palansky, Stephen Siegel, Yvette Mishev, Elizabeth Wolicki and Jack Butz of Armstrong Teasdale and Dana Finberg of O’Hagan Meyer.
Reporting by Diana Jones
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
