House Dems urge NLRB probe of Google's alleged union busting
By Daniel Wiessner
May 30 (Reuters) -Dozens of Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday urged the National Labor Relations Board to swiftly investigate claims that Alphabet's Google illegally laid off workers who unionized, saying the case could have a national impact.
The 46 lawmakers in a letter to NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo said Google is flouting a January board decision requiring it to bargain with YouTube Music content moderators provided by staffing firm Cognizant who voted last year to join the Alphabet Workers Union. Google owns YouTube.
Google has appealed that board ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, saying that it is not the so-called "joint employer" of the YouTube Music workers because Cognizant controlled all of their working conditions.
The union has filed a dozen charges with the NLRB since January accusing Google of retaliation, coercive tactics and effectively firing the roughly 60 Austin, Texas-based workers in February by not renewing a contract with Cognizant.
"The NLRB's response to the termination of YouTube Music workers and alleged labor practice complaints may set important precedent for workers and companies across America," the lawmakers wrote.
An NLRB spokeswoman declined to comment.
"Google does not control the employment terms or conditions of these Cognizant workers, including staffing. We'll continue to assert our position that we’re not a joint employer,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement.
Parul Koul, a software engineer and the president of the Alphabet Workers Union, said the workers were grateful that the House members had taken up their cause.
“If Google is allowed to violate its legal responsibilities to its workers and ignore the directives of the National Labor Relations Board in this case, it will set a terrible precedent for the future of workers’ rights in this country," Koul said in a statement.
The letter to Abruzzo was spearheaded by Reps. Greg Casar of Texas, whose district includes Austin, Donald Norcross of New Jersey, Mark Pocan of Wisconsin, Debbie Dingell of Michigan and Steven Horsford of Nevada.
Google has faced an uptick in labor organizing in the United States and abroad in recent years, including a series of worker protests over the company's business and employment policies.
In November, a group of about 120 employees of Google contractor Accenture who work on artificial intelligence applications voted to unionize. Google claims it is not the joint employer of those workers and is challenging the results of that election.
And the company in April said it was eliminating requirements that U.S. suppliers and staffing firms pay their employees at least $15 an hour and provide health insurance and other benefits, in part to make clear that the company is not a joint employer of contract workers.
Read more:
Google must bargain with YouTube worker union, US labor board rules
Google scraps minimum wage, benefits rules for suppliers and staffing firms
Google workers form small union, eyeing more protests over working conditions
Ex-Google workers say firings for protesting Israel contract were illegal
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York
Activos relacionados
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
