UBS chair warns against big increase in capital requirements, newspaper reports
ZURICH, Sept 29 (Reuters) -UBS UBSG.S Chair Colm Kelleher warned on Sunday that the Swiss government's plans to strengthen capital requirements for big banks could damage the country's position as a financial centre.
The government earlier this year laid out plans for tougher capital requirements for UBS and Switzerland's three other big banks in a bid to make the financial sector more robust after the crash of Credit Suisse last year.
In an article published in the Swiss newspaper SonntagsBlick, Kelleher said he agreed with most of the 22 recommendations in the government's report, except for the proposal for more stringent capital requirements.
"What I really have a big problem with is the increase in capital requirements. It just doesn't make sense," he said about the so-called "too-big-to-fail" report.
Details of the exact capital requirements are yet to emerge, although Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter in April said estimates UBS will require another $15 billion to $25 billion were "plausible".
In a separate estimate, analysts at Autonomous Research said UBS may need to retain an additional$10 billion to $15 billion.
Kelleher declined to comment on figures, but said that excessive capital requirements would damage competitiveness and lead to less favourable prices on banking products for customers.
"We should focus on more important issues such as liquidity management and, above all, the full resolvability of a bank," Kelleher told the newspaper.
Swiss banks contribute to its role as the world's top financialcentre, with some $2.6 trillion in international assets under management, according to a 2021 Deloitte study. However, competition is rising from Luxembourg and in particular Singapore, which has grown rapidly in recent years.
UBS - which has a balance sheet double the size of annual Swiss economic output - would pose dire risks for the Swiss economy if it were to collapse, experts have warned.
Kelleher downplayed the dangers, saying UBS held "significantly more" capital than comparable banks, while the bank's business model - based on wealth management and the Swiss domestic market - meant it was low risk.
UBS remained committed to Switzerland even if Bern demanded a big increase in extra capital, said Kelleher, who has been chair since 2022.
"Although we are a global bank, the heart of UBS is our Swissness," he said, adding there was "no question" the lender would quit its home country.
Still he warned if the bank had to raise its capital levels, it would be detrimental for Switzerland.
"If politics forces us to massively increase our capital, then Switzerland has decided that it no longer wants to be a relevant international financial centre," Kelleher said.
"I think that cannot be in the country's interest."
The former Morgan Stanley MS.N executive said he was ready to speak with the government on its proposals.
Reporting by John Revill
Additional reporting by Emma Farge
Editing by Clelia Oziel
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
