Nvidia’s growing cash hoard points to M&A
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, Nov 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Nvidia NVDA.O is making so much money that founder Jensen Huang doesn’t know what to do with it all. The $3.6 trillion chip designer is spending more on dividends and buybacks, but its cash pile is still growing, doubling over the past year to $35 billion amid a frenzy for the company’s artificial-intelligence chip designs. Combined with Huang’s prodigious ambition and a more lenient antitrust stance under President-elect Donald Trump, M&A may be back on the menu.
Nvidia has grown from a startup to the most valuable company on earth in the three decades since its founding. Huang’s 3.8% stake is worth more than the entire market value of fading $107 billion giant Intel INTC.O. Nvidia’s big insight was to see how the industry could keep increasing computing power even as traditional processor speeds topped out in the early 2000s. It does this by providing chips and software that break the work into pieces so it can be done simultaneously, known as parallel computing. The hardware that the company designs is so in-demand that specialist manufacturers like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 2330.TW have little incentive to spend time supplying possible Nvidia rivals. Huang’s kit and the associated software have become standard among AI developers and in superfast data centers, which act as giant hubs of computing power for large language models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.
As a result, Huang is coining it. Nvidia’s cash has quintupled since 2020 thanks to an eight-fold revenue boost. It will probably keep piling up. Free cash flow, or how much the company’s operations throw off after subtracting capital expenditures, will be $200 billion or more over the next two years, Bank of America analysts expect. Two years of dividends and share buybacks at their current rate would consume about $60 billion of that sum, meaning that in net terms the company’s pot of money would swell by about $140 billion. Add that to the existing pile of money, and Huang would start 2027 with about $175 billion of idle liquidity, which is more even than current cash king Apple AAPL.O. Along with the company’s richly valued shares, that affords ample M&A firepower.
Nvidia last attempted a big deal in 2020, when it agreed to pay $40 billion in cash and stock for chip architecture specialist Arm ARM.O. Huang wanted to use the UK company’s basic semiconductor designs to help make data centers more power efficient. That deal failed after two years of scrutiny by governments and competition watchdogs in the United States, China and Britain. Nvidia could probably expect an easier ride under a more laissez-faire and nationalist Trump administration, particularly if it presented any deal as strengthening a U.S. AI champion. But buying another chipmaker is probably still verboten. For example, Huang might in theory like to snap up $78 billion Marvell Technology MRVL.O for its data-center networking technology and ability to design custom chips for AI developers. The semiconductor sector is global, though, and China and Europe would probably object again if Nvidia tries to buy players with scarce technology, like Marvell or Arm.
Other areas are probably open. Nvidia’s last successful acquisition, the purchase of Mellanox Technologies for $6.9 billion in 2019, provides some clues about Huang’s possible thinking. He bought the networking firm because he could see that computing was moving from working in parallel on a single processor to splitting the work even more widely among different chips. All these different bits of kit must talk to each other, and Mellanox provides the gear that facilitates those interactions. The trend is increasing given the massive workload of training and using AI models. To use a stylized example, a group of 100 servers all talking to each other will have almost 5,000 distinct connections between the different points, while a group of 1,000 would have nearly 500,000. This puts a greater emphasis on sending signals around the network extremely quickly, which is why Nvidia could in theory buy an optical networking firm like $16 billion Coherent COHR.N, whose technology can connect data-center servers together at lightning speeds.
Huang, who has displayed an uncanny ability to foresee major technological shifts, could also go in more unusual directions. As Nvidia’s chips improve, the cost of doing computational work on them has halved roughly every two and a half years. That trend will probably remain on track for some time, making the hardware cheaper and more ubiquitous, and allowing more AI chips to show up outside the data center. That’s why Huang has repeatedly talked about new markets like robotics, autonomous driving and drug development. The company’s growing venture capital operation, which owns $1.8 billion of equity in smaller firms compared with essentially nothing a few years ago, provides a possible glimpse into the future. Huang has built up stakes in analytics company Databricks, which is mulling an initial public offering, robotics companies Serve Robotics and Figure, and drug discovery firm Charm Therapeutics.
Of course, analysts’ rosy forecasts for Nvidia could turn out to be too optimistic. AI has advanced rapidly in the past few years, in large part because the major companies have thrown more data and computing power at the problem. One risk for Nvidia is that this method of improvement may be offering diminishing returns, some researchers are increasingly warning, which would lead to slower growth and less demand for AI-ready chips. Another danger is that tech giants like Microsoft MSFT.O and Amazon.com AMZN.O could redirect spending towards specialized in-house designs as part of an attempt to ease Huang’s grip on the industry. If any of those risks materialize, Nvidia’s cash hoard might grow more slowly than current estimates suggest.
On the other hand, a less sunny outlook may even add impetus to any M&A hunt for Huang, who has a track record of turning the business on a dime. Even Nvidia’s current cash pile exceeds the market value of almost half of the companies in the S&P 500 Index .SPX. It would be a surprise if Huang simply sat on it.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
Nvidia's cash hoard is piling up https://reut.rs/3O6iNbB
Nvidia's stock is a valuable acquisition currency https://reut.rs/4frbvLs
Editing by Liam Proud and Pranav Kiran
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
