New Pharma will crowd out Big Pharma
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Aimee Donnellan
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Big Pharma is under threat from tech-driven upstart rivals. The values of large, established players like $159 billion Pfizer PFE.N, $230 billion Novartis NOVN.S and $216 billion Roche ROG.S are converging with newer players like $121 billion Vertex Pharmaceuticals VRTX.O. As drugmakers wrestle with the need to constantly replenish their stocks of remedies via deals, big names may struggle to remain relevant.
Big Pharma companies have taken over a century to become market leaders. Swiss giant Roche was founded in 1896, while U.S. drugmaker Pfizer has been around since 1849, when typhoid and scarlet fever were among the biggest killers. Both giants came to dominate the industry by making savvy calls on common diseases, like cancer and infectious ailments. M&A is also a critical part of their growth story – witness Roche’s $47 billion takeover of Genentech in 2009, and Pfizer’s $43 billion purchase of cancer specialist Seagen in 2023.
But now a new breed of tech-savvy drugmakers, once the obvious prey of their established rivals, are threatening their dominance. Over the past five years, Amgen AMGN.O, Regeneron REGN.O, Genmab GMAB.CO and Vertex have added $270 billion to their combined market values. That compares to Big Pharma firms like Pfizer, Novartis, GSK GSK.L, Sanofi SASY.PA and Roche, whose aggregate market value has declined by nearly $80 billion in the same period.
The growth of the once bite-sized drugmakers is already creating a hotter climate for takeovers. Last year, the value of biopharma M&A increased by 79% to $152 billion. In 2022, $164 billion Amgen, which is now roughly the same size as Pfizer after increasing fivefold since 2010, splurged $28 billion on Horizon Therapeutics. Analysts reckon Horizon had been on a list of deal targets for more established players for some time.
This increased competition comes at a particularly inopportune moment for executives from traditional drugmakers like Pfizer, Merck MRK.N and GSK, all of which will gradually lose patent exclusivity on some of their top-selling drugs. Merck’s patent on its cancer drug Keytruda, which delivered over $25 billion in sales in 2023, expires in four years. The United States’ Inflation Reduction Act also gives biologic drugs, which are created by using living cells and were historically made by smaller technology-driven drugmakers, longer patents than more established drugs like insulin and antihistamines. That puts an even greater value on the companies that make those newer products.
Deals are often the quickest way of replenishing a drug cupboard. But if there is increased competition, the price of smaller drugmakers will spike. AbbVie’s ABBV.N $10 billion purchase of ImmunoGen earlier this year included an eye-watering 95% premium, suggesting the trend is already in full swing. There are also fewer obvious targets to choose from. In 2022 new drug approvals in the U.S. were down by a quarter, to the lowest level since 2016. Eventually, today’s Big Pharma and their biotech challengers may swap places.
Follow @aimeedonnellan on X
Graphic: Tech-driven drugmakers’ market values are closing in on Big Pharma https://reut.rs/3x2Hy3x
Editing by George Hay and Oliver Taslic
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
