Ford to change its quality leader as it chases lower warranty costs
Ford to appoint new head of quality as Jim Baumbick takes on EV programs role
Ford faces $165 million penalty for recall delays
Ford's shares down 17% this year amid quality challenges
By Nora Eckert
DETROIT, Dec 18 (Reuters) -Ford Motor F.N is appointing a new head of quality, the company confirmed on Wednesday, as the automaker works to reverse its industry-topping record of recalls and reduce warranty costs.
The automaker will move control of its quality team from Jim Baumbick to a new leader who has not yet been announced, as Baumbick takes on the responsibility of EV programs.
Baumbick, who has led quality since late 2022, will oversee the vehicle programs team - which focuses on keeping the costs and timing of vehicles on track - in addition to his existing responsibilities, which include product development operations.
The move, which was announced to some Ford workers internally last week, is expected to take effect early next year.
A Ford spokesperson said the changes would allow its teams to "collaborate and work more efficiently to deliver exciting vehicles and software with the highest levels of quality for our customers."
Ford CEO Jim Farley has made fixing the automaker's quality problems a priority since he took the helm in October 2020. Since then, Ford has changed some of its production practices to better catch errors, and allocated more workers to identify safety concerns. It has topped the industry in number of recalls since 2021.
“After three years of hard work fixing all of our deficits ... we now have everything in place to really see our quality turn for our customers and for our business,” Farley told reporters at an event last week.
When asked about his concerns for next year, Farley responded: "execution."
This year has been particularly tough on the quality front for the Dearborn, Michigan automaker, which agreed to an up to $165 million civil penalty after a government investigation found it failed to recall vehicles with defective rearview cameras in a timely manner.
"It was the most significant action of the year," from the federal safety agency, said Michael Brooks, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety.
Warranty costs have also weighed on Ford's earnings this year. Reviewing second-quarter results, executives said warranty expenses went up $800 million in the period compared with the year-ago quarter, mostly because of issues with vehicles launched in 2021 or earlier.
The automaker's shares are down 17% this year, while Stellantis' STLAM.MI stock is down 40% and General Motors GM.N has gained 43%.
Ford is also under a consent order with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that will last at least three years, and must conduct a thorough review of all recalls it has filed in the last three years and if needed, file new recalls.
As of Wednesday, Ford had 62 recalls in 2024, second only to Stellantis’ 67. GM had 33 recalls.
Reporting by Nora Eckert in Detroit; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.