Cash-strapped US farmers switch to generic crop chemicals, in blow to big manufacturers
Switch to generics pressures brands like Bayer's Roundup
Bayer shares dive to 20-year low
Corteva and BASF may also face pressure
By P.J. Huffstutter and Heather Schlitz
Nov 14 (Reuters) -U.S. farmers struggling with slumping incomes and depressed grain prices have been switching to cheaper generic pesticides and fungicides as they plan for spring planting next year, which market analysts said could hit the bottom lines of agrichemical companies like Bayer.
Signs of these financial impacts are already emerging. Bayer BAYGn.DE shares fell sharply to a 20-year low on Tuesday, after the chemical company warned that weak global agricultural markets and a slumping U.S. farm economy are likely to pressure profits further.
Agrichemical competitors Syngenta, Corteva CTVA.N and the agriculture unit of Germany's BASF BASFn.DE could also face challenges in the sector, analysts said.
Nearly one-third of all the pesticides and fungicides that Paul Butler uses on his Illinois soybean and corn farm are generic to help him cut costs in a tight year, he said.
Fellow Illinois grain grower Jeff O'Connor is doing the same. "It's like if you grew up eating Fruity Pebbles and now you go to Dollar General and get Fruity Bites," he said.
Despite the cost savings, farmers say there can be drawbacks to downgrading. Manufacturers of generic chemicals typically do not cover the cost of respraying if the product does not work, said Caleb Hamer, an Iowa corn and soy farmer.
Still, Midwestern distributors and grain elevators say they have seen customers cutting back their spring pesticide and herbicide budgets.
Some farmers are shifting away from branded products, said Matt Carstens, chief executive of farm cooperative Landus and agricultural financing company Conduit. Others are investing in equipment that targets and treats weeds and pests in their fields - allowing them to buy less herbicides and pesticides altogether, he said.
"It comes down to this: What does the farmer really need? Do they need a name brand, with protection insurance and complaint policies backing it? Do they need to pay for all of that?" Carstens said.
OFF-PATENT CHEMISTRY
When it comes to chemistry, a farmer's buying decisions often are rooted in the seed.
Farmers typically base their chemical purchases with trait-specific seeds they want - such as ones that produce a drought-tolerant crop or can withstand herbicide applications that kill weeds without harming the plant.
If there is a generic option to brand-name herbicides, and the seeds that a farmer purchases can tolerate it, then it can makes sense to go with a less expensive product, said Mac Marshall, founder of agriculture advising firm Balcony View Consulting.
The number of generics available to farmers is growing. The patent for glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and the world's most widely used herbicide, expired in 2000, according to Rabobank agricultural analysts Owen Wagner and Sam Taylor.
More than two dozen active ingredient patents have expired in the past five years - spurring a boom in off-patent use, which now accounts for about 80% of the agrichemical market share, they said.
Now, with farmers facing weak margins this spring, they're more likely to look for cost savings among their fertilizer or crop protection chemicals, Taylor said.
Reporting by P.J. Huffstutter and Heather Schlitz in Chicago. Additional reporting by Karl Plume in Chicago; Editing by David Gregorio
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
