XM Amerika Qoʻshma Shtatlari fuqarolariga xizmat koʻrsatmaydi.

Utah top court skeptical of reviving youth-led climate change case



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Utah top court skeptical of reviving youth-led climate change case</title></head><body>

By Nate Raymond

Sept 4 (Reuters) -Utah's highest court on Wednesday appeared reluctant to revive a lawsuit by young people alleging the state was violating their right to life under the state's constitution by adopting laws that contribute to climate change by promoting fossil fuel development.

Justices on the Utah Supreme Court questioned a lawyer for youth activists suing the state about whether striking down certain laws governing the permitting of oil, gas and coal mining projects would do anything to remedy the climate harms they are alleging given that new fossil fuel projects could still be approved.

"If we can't say that granting the relief you seek would change even a single decision, then there wouldn't be any impact on fossil fuel emissions," Justice Diana Hagen asked the lawyer, Andrew Welle of the non-profit law firm Our Children’s Trust.

Hagen said even if the laws were stuck down, state regulators would still retain discretion to authorize future projects, which the plaintiffs have not sought an injunction to block.

Hagen and other members of the five-judge court suggested that was one of the many potentially fatal flaws of the young activists' lawsuit that would warrant upholding a lower court judge's 2022 decision to toss the case.

That judge, Robert Faust, had concluded the case raised a political question and that nothing in the state's constitution would authorize a judicial remedy to address global climate change.

The lawsuit is one of several climate change cases youth activists have filed nationwide. The youth activists broadly accuse state and federal governments of exacerbating climate change by adopting policies that encourage or allow the extraction and burning of fossil fuels in violation of their rights.

While some of those cases have faltered, a Montana judge last year in a landmark ruling held that the state was violating the rights of young people by barring regulators from considering how new fossil fuel projects could affect climate change.

Hawaii in June agreed to a first-in-the-nation settlement with young people to take action to decarbonize its transportation system by 2045. The Hawaii and Montana cases like the Utah one were pursued by Our Children’s Trust.

In the Utah case, a group of young people alleged they were experiencing serious harms to their health, safety and longevity due to the development and use of fossil fuels in the state, resulting in hazardous air quality and dangerous climate conditions caused by greenhouse gas emissions.

Welle said the statutes in question violate the state's constitution by directing state agencies to promote and authorize fossil fuel development to the maximum extent possible, a policy carried out on a system-wide basis.

"When the citizens who ratified Utah's constitution enshrined its explicit right to life, they understood that it provides fundamental protections, restricting the government from causing serious harm to people's health and safety," Welle said.

His argument faced pushback from a bench comprised entirely of appointees of Republican governors.

Judge Ryan Harris, an appeals court judge sitting in place of a recused justice, noted only one of the laws even used the word "maximized" in its text and appeared designed to ensure oil and gas fields that were authorized were operated "efficiently."

Assistant Solicitor General Erin Middleton said the youth plaintiffs were entitled to disagree with Utah lawmakers' determination that oil, gas and coal development were necessary to ensure its citizens have affordable, reliable energy.

"But they cannot use a generalized declaratory relief action to move the debate about those choices from the elected branches into the court," Middleton said.

The case is Natalie R. v. State of Utah, Utah Supreme Court, No. 20230022-SC.

For the youth plaintiffs: Andrew Welle of Our Children's Trust

For Utah: Erin Middleton of the Utah Attorney General's Office


Read more:

Hawaii agrees to 'groundbreaking' settlement of youth climate change case

Montana urges state top court to overturn landmark climate ruling


</body></html>

Javobgarlikdan voz kechish: XM Group korxonalari har biri faqat ijro xizmatlarini koʻrsatadi va onlayn savdo platformamizdan foydalanish huquqini beradi, bu odamga veb-saytda yoki veb-sayt orqali mavjud boʻlgan kontentni koʻrish va/yoki undan foydalanishga ruxsat beradi hamda uni oʻzgartirishga moʻljallanmagan va uni oʻzgartirmaydi yoki kengaytirmaydi. Bunday kirish va foydalanish huquqi doimo quyidagilarga boʻysunadi: (i) Shartlar va qoidalar; (ii) Risklar haqida ogohlantirish; va (iii) Javobgarlikni toʻliq rad etish. Shuning uchun bunday kontent umumiy maʼlumot sifatida taqdim etiladi. Xususan, shuni esda tutingki, bizning onlayn savdo platformamiz mazmuni moliyaviy bozorlarda biror bitimni amalga oshirishga oid maslahat yoki taklif emas. Har qanday moliyaviy bozorda savdo qilish sizning kapitalingiz uchun jiddiy risk darajasini oʻz ichiga oladi.

Onlayn savdo platformamizda chop etilgan barcha materiallar faqat taʼlim/axborot maqsadlari uchun moʻljallangan va unda moliyaviy, investitsiya soligʻi yoki savdo maslahatlari va tavsiyalar; yoki bizning savdo narxlarimizning qaydlari; yoki har qanday moliyaviy vositalar bilan bitim tuzish maslahati yoki taklifi; yoki sizga kerak boʻlmagan moliyaviy reklama aksiyalari hisoblanmaydi

Har qanday uchinchi tomon kontenti, shuningdek XM tomonidan tayyorlangan kontent, masalan: fikrlar, yangiliklar, tadqiqotlar, tahlillar, narxlar va boshqa maʼlumotlar yoki bu veb-saytda joylashgan uchinchi tomon saytlariga havolalar umumiy bozor sharhi sifatida "boricha" taqdim etiladi va investitsiya maslahatini tashkil etmaydi. Har qanday kontent investitsiya tadqiqoti sifatida talqin qilinsa, siz bunday kontentni investitsiya tadqiqotlarining mustaqilligini ragʻbatlantirish uchun moʻljallangan qonun talablariga muvofiq moʻljallanmagan va tayyorlanmaganligini eʼtiborga olishingiz va qabul qilishingiz kerak, shuning uchun unga tegishli qonunlar va qoidalarga muvofiq marketing kommunikatsiyasi sifatida qaraladi. Mustaqil boʻlmagan investitsiya tadqiqoti va yuqoridagi maʼlumotlarga oid risk haqida ogohlantirishimizni oʻqib chiqqaningizga va tushunganingizga ishonch hosil qiling, unga bu yerdan kirish mumkin.

Riskdan ogohlantirish: Kapitalingiz risk ostida. Kredit yordamiga ega mahsulotlar hammaga ham toʻgʻri kelmasligi mumkin. Bizning Risklardan ogohlantirishimiz bilan tanishib chiqing.