XM Amerika Qoʻshma Shtatlari fuqarolariga xizmat koʻrsatmaydi.

US judge throws out consumer lawsuit over Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian merger



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US judge throws out consumer lawsuit over Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian merger</title></head><body>

By Mike Scarcella

Aug 13 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block Alaska Airlines’ plan to buy Hawaiian Airlines for $1.9 billion, a deal the consumer plaintiffs said would cut routes and raise prices.

Chief U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Hawaii in a Monday order said the airline passengers who brought the case had not shown they have legal standing to sue over the merger.

“They allege no personal connection to either airline that would plausibly establish a concrete or particularized harm,” Watson wrote in his order dismissing the lawsuit.

Alaska Airlines in a statement said it welcomed the decision, and said the merger will "expand benefits and choice for consumers."

An attorney for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The merger, announced last year, still faces U.S. regulatory review by the U.S. Justice Department. A spokesperson for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Last month, Alaska and Hawaiian said they were cooperating with the DOJ probe and had agreed to extend the review period until Aug. 15.

Eight airline passengers from Hawaii, California and other states sued to stop the Alaskan Airlines deal in April,arguing it would violate U.S. antitrust law.

Their lawsuit said “the current trend toward concentration, the lessening of competition and the tendency to create a monopoly in the airlines industry is unmatched, unparalleled, and dangerous.”

Alaska Airlines, the fifth-largest U.S. carrier, countered that the merger would give customers greater access to more travel destinations. It called the plaintiffs “serial litigants” who presented “boilerplate” claims.

Hawaiian Airlines was not a defendant in the lawsuit.


The case is Warren Yoshimoto et al v. Alaska Airlines and Alaska Air Group, U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, No. 1:24-cv-00173.

For plaintiffs: Terence O'Toole of Starn O'Toole Marcus & Fisher; and Joseph Alioto of Alioto Law Firm

For Alaska Air: Courtney Dyer, Stephen McIntyre, Anna Pletcher and Pete Herrick of O’Melveny & Myers


Read more:

Alaska Airlines asks US court to reject lawsuit over Hawaiian merger

US consumers sue to stop Alaska Air, Hawaiian Airlines merger



Reporting by Mike Scarcella

</body></html>

Javobgarlikdan voz kechish: XM Group korxonalari har biri faqat ijro xizmatlarini koʻrsatadi va onlayn savdo platformamizdan foydalanish huquqini beradi, bu odamga veb-saytda yoki veb-sayt orqali mavjud boʻlgan kontentni koʻrish va/yoki undan foydalanishga ruxsat beradi hamda uni oʻzgartirishga moʻljallanmagan va uni oʻzgartirmaydi yoki kengaytirmaydi. Bunday kirish va foydalanish huquqi doimo quyidagilarga boʻysunadi: (i) Shartlar va qoidalar; (ii) Risklar haqida ogohlantirish; va (iii) Javobgarlikni toʻliq rad etish. Shuning uchun bunday kontent umumiy maʼlumot sifatida taqdim etiladi. Xususan, shuni esda tutingki, bizning onlayn savdo platformamiz mazmuni moliyaviy bozorlarda biror bitimni amalga oshirishga oid maslahat yoki taklif emas. Har qanday moliyaviy bozorda savdo qilish sizning kapitalingiz uchun jiddiy risk darajasini oʻz ichiga oladi.

Onlayn savdo platformamizda chop etilgan barcha materiallar faqat taʼlim/axborot maqsadlari uchun moʻljallangan va unda moliyaviy, investitsiya soligʻi yoki savdo maslahatlari va tavsiyalar; yoki bizning savdo narxlarimizning qaydlari; yoki har qanday moliyaviy vositalar bilan bitim tuzish maslahati yoki taklifi; yoki sizga kerak boʻlmagan moliyaviy reklama aksiyalari hisoblanmaydi

Har qanday uchinchi tomon kontenti, shuningdek XM tomonidan tayyorlangan kontent, masalan: fikrlar, yangiliklar, tadqiqotlar, tahlillar, narxlar va boshqa maʼlumotlar yoki bu veb-saytda joylashgan uchinchi tomon saytlariga havolalar umumiy bozor sharhi sifatida "boricha" taqdim etiladi va investitsiya maslahatini tashkil etmaydi. Har qanday kontent investitsiya tadqiqoti sifatida talqin qilinsa, siz bunday kontentni investitsiya tadqiqotlarining mustaqilligini ragʻbatlantirish uchun moʻljallangan qonun talablariga muvofiq moʻljallanmagan va tayyorlanmaganligini eʼtiborga olishingiz va qabul qilishingiz kerak, shuning uchun unga tegishli qonunlar va qoidalarga muvofiq marketing kommunikatsiyasi sifatida qaraladi. Mustaqil boʻlmagan investitsiya tadqiqoti va yuqoridagi maʼlumotlarga oid risk haqida ogohlantirishimizni oʻqib chiqqaningizga va tushunganingizga ishonch hosil qiling, unga bu yerdan kirish mumkin.

Riskdan ogohlantirish: Kapitalingiz risk ostida. Kredit yordamiga ega mahsulotlar hammaga ham toʻgʻri kelmasligi mumkin. Bizning Risklardan ogohlantirishimiz bilan tanishib chiqing.