T-Mobile class action plaintiffs slash legal fee bid to $46 million
By Mike Scarcella
Sept 11 (Reuters) -Lawyers who represented T-Mobile customers in a $350 million class action settlement have asked a U.S. judge to award them $46 million in legal fees after a federal appeals court struck down their earlier bid for nearly twice the amount.
The attorneys in a filing on Tuesday night in Missouri federal court said $46 million was justified following a decision in July by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found the original $78 million award to be a “windfall.”
The lawyers said approval of the reduced amount would minimize any further delay and help get money into the hands of class members who accused T-Mobile of a data security breach.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and neither did two attorneys who opposed the original fee bid.
T-Mobile also did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company did not oppose the original $78 million fee award.
T-Mobile in 2022 settled the consumer privacy case for $350 million, and also said it would spend an additional $150 million on upgraded security efforts. It denied any wrongdoing.
The settlement resolved privacy claims from an estimated 76 million T-Mobile customers whose personal information was compromised in a cyber breach.
In July, the St. Louis-based 8th Circuit Court in a 3-0 ruling said the attorneys' initial fee award was too high based on the hours of legal work they spent on the case.
The panel said reducing the fee amount by half — to about $39 million — would not harm the class attorneys because their hourly rate would work out to $3,500 to $4,750.
The class lawyers said the requested amount of nearly $46 million amounted to 13.08% of the $350 million cash fund. That percentage, they said, is lower than recent data breach settlements involving Equifax, Yahoo! And health insurer Anthem.
The attorneys argued their request was "reasonable by any metric."
The case is In re: T-Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, No. 4:21-md-03019-BCW.
For plaintiffs: Norman Siegel of Stueve Siegel Hanson; Cari Campen Laufenberg of Keller Rohrback; and James Pizzirusso of Hausfeld
For T-Mobile: Kristy McAlister Brown and Donald Houser of Alston & Bird
Read more:
US appeals court tosses ‘windfall’ $78 mln legal fee in T-Mobile lawsuit
Lawyers fight over $78 mln fee bid in T-Mobile data breach settlement
T-Mobile to pay $350 mln in settlement over massive hacking
Aloqador aktivlar
Eng oxirgi yangiliklar
Javobgarlikdan voz kechish: XM Group korxonalari har biri faqat ijro xizmatlarini koʻrsatadi va onlayn savdo platformamizdan foydalanish huquqini beradi, bu odamga veb-saytda yoki veb-sayt orqali mavjud boʻlgan kontentni koʻrish va/yoki undan foydalanishga ruxsat beradi hamda uni oʻzgartirishga moʻljallanmagan va uni oʻzgartirmaydi yoki kengaytirmaydi. Bunday kirish va foydalanish huquqi doimo quyidagilarga boʻysunadi: (i) Shartlar va qoidalar; (ii) Risklar haqida ogohlantirish; va (iii) Javobgarlikni toʻliq rad etish. Shuning uchun bunday kontent umumiy maʼlumot sifatida taqdim etiladi. Xususan, shuni esda tutingki, bizning onlayn savdo platformamiz mazmuni moliyaviy bozorlarda biror bitimni amalga oshirishga oid maslahat yoki taklif emas. Har qanday moliyaviy bozorda savdo qilish sizning kapitalingiz uchun jiddiy risk darajasini oʻz ichiga oladi.
Onlayn savdo platformamizda chop etilgan barcha materiallar faqat taʼlim/axborot maqsadlari uchun moʻljallangan va unda moliyaviy, investitsiya soligʻi yoki savdo maslahatlari va tavsiyalar; yoki bizning savdo narxlarimizning qaydlari; yoki har qanday moliyaviy vositalar bilan bitim tuzish maslahati yoki taklifi; yoki sizga kerak boʻlmagan moliyaviy reklama aksiyalari hisoblanmaydi
Har qanday uchinchi tomon kontenti, shuningdek XM tomonidan tayyorlangan kontent, masalan: fikrlar, yangiliklar, tadqiqotlar, tahlillar, narxlar va boshqa maʼlumotlar yoki bu veb-saytda joylashgan uchinchi tomon saytlariga havolalar umumiy bozor sharhi sifatida "boricha" taqdim etiladi va investitsiya maslahatini tashkil etmaydi. Har qanday kontent investitsiya tadqiqoti sifatida talqin qilinsa, siz bunday kontentni investitsiya tadqiqotlarining mustaqilligini ragʻbatlantirish uchun moʻljallangan qonun talablariga muvofiq moʻljallanmagan va tayyorlanmaganligini eʼtiborga olishingiz va qabul qilishingiz kerak, shuning uchun unga tegishli qonunlar va qoidalarga muvofiq marketing kommunikatsiyasi sifatida qaraladi. Mustaqil boʻlmagan investitsiya tadqiqoti va yuqoridagi maʼlumotlarga oid risk haqida ogohlantirishimizni oʻqib chiqqaningizga va tushunganingizga ishonch hosil qiling, unga bu yerdan kirish mumkin.