XM Amerika Qoʻshma Shtatlari fuqarolariga xizmat koʻrsatmaydi.

Massachusetts voters allow Uber, Lyft drivers to unionize



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 1-Massachusetts voters allow Uber, Lyft drivers to unionize</title></head><body>

First U.S. state to give drivers path to unionizing

Could provide blueprint for drivers in other states

Uber, Lyft have expressed concerns about details

Adds SEIU comment in paragraphs 4-5; adds Uber and Lyft statements in paragraphs 13-15

By Nate Raymond

BOSTON, Nov 6 (Reuters) -Massachusetts voters on Tuesday approved a ballot measure that would allow ride-share drivers to unionize, becoming the first U.S. state to allow drivers for app-based companies like Uber UBER.N and Lyft LYFT.O to do so.

With 94% of precincts reporting, 53.9% of voters endorsed a novel framework that would allow ride-share drivers who are considered by the companies to be independent contractors to organize and bargain collectively over pay and benefits, according to the Associated Press, which called the vote mid-Wednesday.

Supporters have said the ballot measure known as Question 3 could provide a model for other states to let Uber and Lyft drivers unionize and inspire efforts to organize them around the United States.

Roxana Rivera, assistant to the president of 32BJ SEIU, an affiliate of the Service Employees International Union, that had spearheaded a campaign to pass the proposal, said its approval shows that Massachusetts voters want drivers to have a meaningful check against the growing power of app-based companies.

“Working people in Massachusetts have won a monumental victory with Question 3," Rivera said in a statement.

The Massachusetts vote was the latest front in a years-long battle in the United States over whether ride-share drivers should be considered to be independent contractors or employees entitled to benefits and wage protections. Studies have shown that using contractors can cost companies as much as 30% less than employees.

Drivers for Uber and Lyft, including approximately 70,000 in Massachusetts, do not have the right to organize under the National Labor Relations Act, a federal law that covers only actual employees.

Under the Massachusetts measure, drivers can form a union after collecting signatures from at least 25% of active drivers in Massachusetts, andcompanies can formassociations to allow them to jointly negotiate with the union during state-supervised talks.

The measure was backed by the SEIU and the International Association of Machinists and was endorsed by several top political leaders, including Andrea Campbell, the state's Democratic attorney general.

Campbell in June secured a settlement with Uber and Lyft requiring them to adopta $32.50 hourly minimum pay standard for Massachusetts drivers and pay $175 million to resolve claims they had improperly treated drivers as independent contractors, rather than employees.

The companies as part of the settlement abandoned their support of a since-dropped ballot measure that would have codified into law the drivers' status as contractors. But the settlement stopped short of declaring the drivers employees.

Uber and Lyft opted not to campaign against Question 3, though both said they had concerns with certain language in the measure that they hoped could be addressed by the state legislature.

In a statement on Wednesday, Uber noted that the proposal "just squeaked by" even though Massachusetts is a "deeply blue, pro-union state."

"It’s clear that voters have reservations and it’s now incumbent upon the legislature to address their concerns," the company said.

Lyft in a statement said: "With the passage of this ballot measure, we look forward to working collaboratively on its implementations and addressing some of the language concerns we have during the legislative session next year."

Question 3 had been put forward before the industry dropped its separate ballot proposal, and its supporters argued that it provided the best path forward for drivers to secure better working conditions post-settlement.

Question 3 divided the local labor movement, with some activists saying it did not go far enough. Some opponents also had argued it may conflict with federal law and be open to a legal challenge.



Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston and Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, Editing by Will Dunham, Alexia Garamfalvi and Diane Craft

</body></html>

Javobgarlikdan voz kechish: XM Group korxonalari har biri faqat ijro xizmatlarini koʻrsatadi va onlayn savdo platformamizdan foydalanish huquqini beradi, bu odamga veb-saytda yoki veb-sayt orqali mavjud boʻlgan kontentni koʻrish va/yoki undan foydalanishga ruxsat beradi hamda uni oʻzgartirishga moʻljallanmagan va uni oʻzgartirmaydi yoki kengaytirmaydi. Bunday kirish va foydalanish huquqi doimo quyidagilarga boʻysunadi: (i) Shartlar va qoidalar; (ii) Risklar haqida ogohlantirish; va (iii) Javobgarlikni toʻliq rad etish. Shuning uchun bunday kontent umumiy maʼlumot sifatida taqdim etiladi. Xususan, shuni esda tutingki, bizning onlayn savdo platformamiz mazmuni moliyaviy bozorlarda biror bitimni amalga oshirishga oid maslahat yoki taklif emas. Har qanday moliyaviy bozorda savdo qilish sizning kapitalingiz uchun jiddiy risk darajasini oʻz ichiga oladi.

Onlayn savdo platformamizda chop etilgan barcha materiallar faqat taʼlim/axborot maqsadlari uchun moʻljallangan va unda moliyaviy, investitsiya soligʻi yoki savdo maslahatlari va tavsiyalar; yoki bizning savdo narxlarimizning qaydlari; yoki har qanday moliyaviy vositalar bilan bitim tuzish maslahati yoki taklifi; yoki sizga kerak boʻlmagan moliyaviy reklama aksiyalari hisoblanmaydi

Har qanday uchinchi tomon kontenti, shuningdek XM tomonidan tayyorlangan kontent, masalan: fikrlar, yangiliklar, tadqiqotlar, tahlillar, narxlar va boshqa maʼlumotlar yoki bu veb-saytda joylashgan uchinchi tomon saytlariga havolalar umumiy bozor sharhi sifatida "boricha" taqdim etiladi va investitsiya maslahatini tashkil etmaydi. Har qanday kontent investitsiya tadqiqoti sifatida talqin qilinsa, siz bunday kontentni investitsiya tadqiqotlarining mustaqilligini ragʻbatlantirish uchun moʻljallangan qonun talablariga muvofiq moʻljallanmagan va tayyorlanmaganligini eʼtiborga olishingiz va qabul qilishingiz kerak, shuning uchun unga tegishli qonunlar va qoidalarga muvofiq marketing kommunikatsiyasi sifatida qaraladi. Mustaqil boʻlmagan investitsiya tadqiqoti va yuqoridagi maʼlumotlarga oid risk haqida ogohlantirishimizni oʻqib chiqqaningizga va tushunganingizga ishonch hosil qiling, unga bu yerdan kirish mumkin.

Riskdan ogohlantirish: Kapitalingiz risk ostida. Kredit yordamiga ega mahsulotlar hammaga ham toʻgʻri kelmasligi mumkin. Bizning Risklardan ogohlantirishimiz bilan tanishib chiqing.