Google loses bid to question Texas in state’s biometric privacy lawsuit
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 2 (Reuters) -A Texas state judge on Friday barred Google from questioning the state and its legal team in their lawsuit accusing the Alphabet GOOGL.O unit of unlawfully collecting biometric privacy data of millions of Texans without consent.
In a brief order, Judge Leah Robinson in Midland County said Google could not compel Texas to submit to a deposition in the case. Texas had opposed Google’s effort to depose the state, calling it an impermissible effort to “investigate the investigator.”
Google wanted to question Texas over the state’s understanding of key terms in the privacy law at the center of the 2022 lawsuit, including how liabilities and penalties are determined. Google said the state had refused to offer a witness who could talk about the basis of the state’s claims and provide evidence that Google could need for its defense.
Google on Friday declined to comment. The Texas attorney general's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Texas in its lawsuit accused Google of deceptive trade practices and alleged it violated a state law that shields biometric identifiers such as faces, fingerprints and eye scans from being captured without approval.
Google unlawfully collected biometric data through Google Photos, Google Assistant and Nest Hub Max, Texas said. The privacy law sets out penalties of up to $25,000 per violation. Google has denied any wrongdoing.
Google told the court in a filing in May that the Texas biometric privacy law “sat unenforced for its first twenty years on the books” before the state lodged cases against Google and Facebook parent Meta in 2022.
Meta META.O this week agreed to pay $1.4 billion to resolve the Texas lawsuit.
Lawyers for Texas at Keller Postman and McKool Smith said the settlement was the largest-ever won by a single state. Meta denied any wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.
The case is Texas v Google LLC, 385th Judicial District Court, Midland County, No. CV58999.
For Texas: Marc Collier and Joseph Graham Jr of Norton Rose Fulbright
For Google: R. Paul Yetter of Yetter Coleman; Benedict Hur and Simona Agnolucci of Willkie Farr & Gallagher
Read more:
Legal Fee Tracker: Texas contracts show law firms' stake in $1.4 bln Meta settlement
Meta to pay $1.4 billion to settle Texas facial recognition data lawsuit
Texas fights Google deposition bid in biometric privacy lawsuit
Texas sues Google for allegedly capturing biometric data of millions without consent
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Aloqador aktivlar
Eng oxirgi yangiliklar
Javobgarlikdan voz kechish: XM Group korxonalari har biri faqat ijro xizmatlarini koʻrsatadi va onlayn savdo platformamizdan foydalanish huquqini beradi, bu odamga veb-saytda yoki veb-sayt orqali mavjud boʻlgan kontentni koʻrish va/yoki undan foydalanishga ruxsat beradi hamda uni oʻzgartirishga moʻljallanmagan va uni oʻzgartirmaydi yoki kengaytirmaydi. Bunday kirish va foydalanish huquqi doimo quyidagilarga boʻysunadi: (i) Shartlar va qoidalar; (ii) Risklar haqida ogohlantirish; va (iii) Javobgarlikni toʻliq rad etish. Shuning uchun bunday kontent umumiy maʼlumot sifatida taqdim etiladi. Xususan, shuni esda tutingki, bizning onlayn savdo platformamiz mazmuni moliyaviy bozorlarda biror bitimni amalga oshirishga oid maslahat yoki taklif emas. Har qanday moliyaviy bozorda savdo qilish sizning kapitalingiz uchun jiddiy risk darajasini oʻz ichiga oladi.
Onlayn savdo platformamizda chop etilgan barcha materiallar faqat taʼlim/axborot maqsadlari uchun moʻljallangan va unda moliyaviy, investitsiya soligʻi yoki savdo maslahatlari va tavsiyalar; yoki bizning savdo narxlarimizning qaydlari; yoki har qanday moliyaviy vositalar bilan bitim tuzish maslahati yoki taklifi; yoki sizga kerak boʻlmagan moliyaviy reklama aksiyalari hisoblanmaydi
Har qanday uchinchi tomon kontenti, shuningdek XM tomonidan tayyorlangan kontent, masalan: fikrlar, yangiliklar, tadqiqotlar, tahlillar, narxlar va boshqa maʼlumotlar yoki bu veb-saytda joylashgan uchinchi tomon saytlariga havolalar umumiy bozor sharhi sifatida "boricha" taqdim etiladi va investitsiya maslahatini tashkil etmaydi. Har qanday kontent investitsiya tadqiqoti sifatida talqin qilinsa, siz bunday kontentni investitsiya tadqiqotlarining mustaqilligini ragʻbatlantirish uchun moʻljallangan qonun talablariga muvofiq moʻljallanmagan va tayyorlanmaganligini eʼtiborga olishingiz va qabul qilishingiz kerak, shuning uchun unga tegishli qonunlar va qoidalarga muvofiq marketing kommunikatsiyasi sifatida qaraladi. Mustaqil boʻlmagan investitsiya tadqiqoti va yuqoridagi maʼlumotlarga oid risk haqida ogohlantirishimizni oʻqib chiqqaningizga va tushunganingizga ishonch hosil qiling, unga bu yerdan kirish mumkin.
