Woodside’s deal poses a new green conundrum
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Antony Currie
MELBOURNE, Aug 13 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Woodside Energy's WDS.AX latestattempt to win over its climate-conscious shareholders smells a bit off. The Australian oil and gas driller is paying $2.4 billion to buy an ammonia plant that OCI Global is building in Texas. The facility aims to produce the commodity, used in fertilisers and chemical processes, with less carbon pollution than current methods. But the deal raises more questions than it answers.
The project will still largely make ammonia the old-fashioned way, using natural, or fossil, gas, rather than renewable energy, to generate the hydrogen which is then mixed with nitrogen. The goal, once the factory is fully operational in 2026, is to trap and pump the emissions underground; Woodside says the deal is a material step towards hitting its Scope 3 targets, including to invest in lower-carbon services.
However, this so-called carbon capture and storage technology has a patchy record. And some of the forecast articulated by Woodside CEO Meg O'Neill for a doubling of demand for ammonia by 2050 relies onnew applications, such asreplacing some coal in power stations and replacing diesel as a shipping fuel. But ammonia is toxicand when burned can produce nitrous oxide, almost 300 times more powerful a greenhouse gas than carbon.
Even were these new uses to thrive, they might not be enough to improve the $31 billion company's battered green credentials. One reason 58% of investors gave its climate transition plan the thumbs down in a non-binding vote in April was the lack of concrete plans to reduce the 73 million tons of carbon emissions each year from clients burning its products.
O'Neill argues the ammonia made at the Texas facility could lop up to 3.2million tons off the tab - or two-thirds of the 2030target it had set that shareholders deemed unconvincing. That would only be valid if customers swapped Woodside's gas for its ammonia. Moreover, Woodside wouldn't be capturing and storing the carbon; Exxon Mobil XOM.N would, so it would arguably have a claim to the emissions-reduction credit.
The acquisition's expected internal rate of return of around 10% is not much to cheer, either. It's less than the 12% O'Neill targets from fossil-fuel investments - though last month's $1.2 billion acquisition of Tellurian, a liquid natural gas business, will struggle to hit that, Citi analysts reckon. How to get shareholders onside for her greener and dirtier plans alike is becoming a conundrum.
Follow @AntonyMCurrie on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Australia'sWoodside Energy on Aug. 5 said it hadagreed to buy an ammonia project in Texas from OCI Global for $2.4 billion. The plant is still under construction and is expected to open in 2025. Initial annual production capacity is 1.1 million tons, which could eventually double.
The plan is for the project to use so-called blue hydrogen, which is made using natural, or fossil, gas, with some of the methane and carbon emissions captured and then stored underground rather than being released into the atmosphere. This part of the project is not expected to begin until 2026.
Linde is under contract to supply the hydrogen, while ExxonMobil will run the carbon capture and storage.
Woodside saysthe fully operational project could help customers reduce their emissions by 3.2 million tons of CO2-equivalent a year, assuming all production was used to replace diesel as a fuel for ships.
Graphic: Woodside stock lags rivals since its mini-M&A spree https://reut.rs/46Hd0Sf
Editing by Una Galani and Aditya Srivastav
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
