美國居民不適用 XM 服務。

Walmart's JD exit displays derisking smarts



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>RPT-BREAKINGVIEWS-Walmart's JD exit displays derisking smarts</title></head><body>

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

By Chan Ka Sing

HONG KONG, Aug 21 (Reuters Breakingviews) -It may be tempting to scream "decoupling" after a quick glance at Walmart's WMT.N decision to offload its entire stake in JD.com 9618.HK, JD.Ofor $3.6 billion, per IFR. The $600 billion U.S. retail behemoth has, after all, been a shareholder in the Chinese e-commerce group since 2016. It's also selling after its strategic partner's stock has dropped 70% from a 2021 peak - and for not much more than the shares were worth when it first got them. But the move is actually a good example of derisking.

Unlike other global retailers such as Tesco TSCO.L and Carrefour CARR.PA, Walmart is not leaving China's ultra-competitive consumer market. It owns, for example, almost 400 stores in the People's Republic, including its membership-only warehouse chain, Sam's Club, and these are performing well: net sales grew 18% in the most recent quarter, while JD.com's top line barely budged.

That's a marked change from when the pair's relationship began eight years ago. Walmart was under pressure: back home, Amazon AMZN.O had surpassed its market value for the first time in July 2015; meanwhile, in the People's Republic a fast-growing JD.com was performing better than the Arkansas-headquartered company's China-focused online operation, Yihaodian. So as part of a broader alliance Walmart CEO Doug McMillon handed control of the unit to JD.com in return for a 5% stake in its new partner, which it doubled later that year.

The People’s Republic has since become a very different proposition. Consumer confidence has faltered as the $17 trillion economy stutters on the brink of deflation, while major e-commerce firms engage in brutal price wars to entice online shoppers. Escalating U.S.-China tension also makes it more complicated for American giants such as Walmart and Starbucks SBUX.O to continue their expansion in China.

McMillon's decision to focus on its own operations in China at least gives it more control over investment and growth there. It also sends a stark message about JD.com's prospects. Its stock had jumped 38% after hitting an almost six-year low in March. Deep-pocketed Walmart, though, sees more upside in cashing out now and investing the proceeds elsewhere. That makes it much harder for JD.com Chair Richard Liu to convince shareholders there's a rosier future around the corner.

CONTEXT NEWS

Walmart has sold its entire stake in Chinese e-commerce firm JD.com, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Aug. 20. The U.S. retailer was the largest shareholder and raised some $3.6 billion from the sale, according to IFR, or some $24.95 a share - a discount of 11.5% to the closing price of JD.com's Nasdaq-listed stock on Aug. 20.

In 2016 Walmart receiveda 5% stake in JD.com in a deal that also involved the Chinese retailer taking over Walmart’s China-focused online marketplace. In the same year, Walmart raised its holdings in JD.com to more than10%.


Graphic: JD.com is trading close to its all-time low https://reut.rs/3WMjx9C


Editing by Antony Currie and Aditya Srivastav

</body></html>

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明