Vanguard bullish on proxy votes for the masses: Ross Kerber
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. This column is part of the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter, which you can sign up for here
By Ross Kerber
Sept 17 (Reuters) -Only 2% of Vanguard investors opted in to a pilot program to influence their funds' proxy votes this year, the Pennsylvania-based asset manager said, a low rate I thought might suggest its clients don't care about corporate elections.
Not so, said John Galloway, Vanguard's global head of investment stewardship. The paltry rate reflected the challenges of reaching a vast customer base through intermediaries like brokerage firms, Galloway told me and a group of other business journalists on Monday.
"We're committed to bringing this to scale," Galloway said on a video call. He said to expect new pilot programs in 2025 as his team works out technical solutions to communications problems. Eventually Vanguard aims to offer proxy voting options to all its equity index products, which account for $6.6 trillion of its $9.7 trillion of assets under management.
Traditionally individual retail investors only vote about 30% of the shares they own. That should be the natural rate for Vanguard's own investors as well, Galloway said. "We're pretty bullish," he said.
Putting more proxy voting power in the hands of investors sounds great in theory. But so far experiments by Vanguard, BlackRock BLK.N and others have had little if any impact on corporate election outcomes, said Bruce Goldfarb, president of proxy solicitor Okapi Partners.
Investors, Goldfarb said, may be content to leave the process to their asset managers. While there was a lot of early interest, "I think some of that momentum has slowed as retail investors realize it's a lot of work to vote their shares," he said.
Corporate elections have drawn increased attention since the financial crisis as activistsused them to pressure companies on environmental, social and governance matters. Some executives say regulators have given shareholders too much power to shape the agenda of corporate annual meetings.
The rush of assets into low-fee passive funds like the famed Vanguard 500 Index Fund VOO.P has given their managers outsized influence as major owners of top U.S. corporations. Their size has raised concernsfrom many sides, and giving clients more voting power could reduce the heat.
Rather than allowing votes on individual companies, the funds' programs mostly let investors chose the flavor of how their money is voted. For instance last December Vanguard said under its "Investor Choice" programit would allow investors in five funds with a combined $100 billion to choose among four policies to direct how their assets would be voted.
Of the 2 million investors eligible to participate, only about 40,000 signed up, Vanguard now says. Moreover, of that group, 43% selected the option to vote as the Vanguard fund managers would havein any case. Another 30% chose an option to vote as company boards recommended - hardly a rock-the-boat message from the Main Street shareholders Vanguard services.
Galloway said the data was still valuable as an answer to lingering questions about what investors want.
He also noted how, not surprisingly, of the investors in the Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF ESGV.Z who participated in the pilot, 78% chose an ESG-friendly voting policy, more than three times the 24% rate at which all pilot participants went with ESG.
In a report in August Vanguard said it did not back any of 400 shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters. Galloway said that with more direct voting options, ESG-minded fund investors will be able to express their views better.
“Over time, as we bring the Investor Choice program to scale, it will be clear there is not a ‘Vanguard vote’, but rather votes based on choices made by individual investors,” Galloway told me in a followup e-mail.
Vanguard proxy pilot results https://reut.rs/47sevEc
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
