US Supreme Court rebuffs challenge to Illinois assault weapon bans
By Andrew Chung
WASHINGTON, July 2 (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court steered clear on Tuesday of another major dispute over gun rights, turning away appeals of a judicial ruling backing a Democratic-backed ban in Illinois on assault-style rifles such as AR-15s.
The justices declined to hear a group of cases appealing a lower court's rejection of the challengers' argument that the ban violates the right to keep and bear arms under U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.
The legal dispute centers on whether assault rifles are weapons that are chiefly useful in military service and thus may be subject to a ban. The Supreme Court, in a landmark 2008 ruling expanding gun rights, noted that "M-16 rifles and the like" are not protected under the Second Amendment.
The availability of assault rifles, which are popular among gun enthusiasts, continues to fuel fierce debate in a nation bitterly divided over how to address firearms violence including frequent mass shootings.
The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has taken an expansive view of Second Amendment rights.
In 2022, the court recognized a constitutional right to carry a handgun in public for self defense in a decision that struck down New York state gun limits on carrying concealed firearms.
That ruling established a legal standard that could make it harder for lower courts to sustain new or existing gun regulations, requiring such measures to be comparable with the nation's "historical tradition" of firearm restrictions.
However, the court clarified on June 21 that modern restrictions need a historical "analogue" but not a "twin" in a ruling that upheld a federal gun possession ban targeting domestic abusers, signaling the limits of the Bruen standard.
A federal assault weapon ban enacted in 1994 lapsed a decade later and has not been renewed by Congress despite Democratic efforts. In the absence of broad action by Congress on gun control, some states have enacted various measures, often drawing legal challenges on Second Amendment grounds.
The Illinois law bans the sale and distribution of many kinds of high-powered semiautomatic "assault weapons," including AK-47 and AR-15 rifles, as well as magazines that take more than 10 rounds for long guns and 15 rounds for handguns. The ban was passed in 2023 after a massacre at a 2022 Independence Day parade in the Chicago suburb of Highland Park that killed seven people.
Several groups of plaintiffs contested the state's ban on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines in federal and state courts.
The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in November 2023 that the challengers were unlikely to succeed in their challenges, in part because the Second Amendment does not apply to the banned rifles and magazines, which it concluded "are much more like machine guns and military-grade weaponry than they are like the many different types of firearms that are used for individual self-defense."
The Supreme Court previously rebuffed efforts by certain of the plaintiffs to block the Illinois law as the litigation played out.
In court papers, Illinois said that 14 states have enacted laws restricting certain types of semiautomatic firearms or magazines that allow shooters to fire rapidly without reloading "making them the instruments of choice in mass shootings."
The Supreme Court on May 20 declined to hear a challenge to a Democratic-backed ban in Maryland on assault-style rifles while that litigation continues in a lower court.
The justices also acted on another important gun-related case this year, rejecting on June 14 a federal ban on "bump stock" devices that enable semiautomatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns.
Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
