Tesco loses UK legal battle over 'fire and rehire' of staff
Tesco cannot 'fire and rehire' to remove increased pay – court
Ruling is 'win for the trade union movement', union says
Retailer says it wanted to 'ensure fairness' for staff
Adds government comment in paragraph 5
By Sam Tobin
LONDON, Sept 12 (Reuters) -Tesco TSCO.L was not entitled to terminate some employees' contracts and offer to rehire them on less favourable terms, the United Kingdom's Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.
Shopworkers' union Usdaw took legal action against Britain's biggest retailer after Tesco sought to remove some warehouse workers' entitlement to increased pay.
Tesco ended their contracts and offered to re-engage them -- a controversial practice often referred to as "fire and rehire".
Britain's governing Labour Party has said it will outlaw "fire and rehire" tactics, but has yet to set out how it will replace current codes of practice.
A spokesperson for Britain's Department for Business and Trade said: "We will be bringing forward legislation soon to put an end to unscrupulous fire and rehire practices, which have no place in a modern labour market."
The Supreme Court ruled that Tesco was not permitted to use "fire and rehire" to remove some workers' increased pay and restored an injunction preventing the retailer from doing so.
Tesco, which has a British grocery market share of nearly 28%, said it accepted the ruling. A spokesperson said it related to "a very small number of colleagues in our UK distribution network who receive a supplement to their pay".
"Our objective in this has always been to ensure fairness across all our distribution centre colleagues," the spokesperson added.
Paddy Lillis, Usdaw general secretary, said in a statement that the ruling was "a win for the trade union movement as a whole".
Lillis said of "fire and rehire" itself: "These sorts of tactics have no place in industrial relations, so we felt we had to act to protect those concerned."
The dispute centred on certain warehouse workers' entitlement to enhanced pay for agreeing to move to a new distribution centre back in 2007.
When Tesco sought to remove the entitlement in 2021, it asked workers to agree to its removal for a lump sum payment or else their contract would be terminated and a new contract offered without the increased pay included.
Usdaw initially won an injunction, which prevented Tesco from dismissing the warehouse workers and offering them new contracts, but Tesco overturned that ruling in 2022.
The union's lawyer, Oliver Segal, said in court documents for the appeal in April that led to Thursday's ruling that Tesco was effectively arguing it has an "unrestricted freedom to terminate the relationship 'at will'."
Tesco, however, argued the affected workers had received increased pay worth thousands of pounds each for more than a decade.
Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by William James, Alison Williams, Alexandra Hudson
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
