Tariffs offer poor airbag for Europe’s carmageddon
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Neil Unmack
LONDON, July 15 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The cavalry has arrived, but try telling that to European carmakers. Volkswagen VOWG_p.DE, Renault RENA.PA and others still have miserable valuations despite Brussels threatening China with electric-vehicle penalties. The duties may not be big enough, and could even hurt Western players.
At first glance, Brussels’ provisional tariffs look like a lifeline for the European automotive industry. Electric vehicles (EVs) made in the Middle Kingdom accounted for 25% of sales in the continent during the year to September 2023, the European Commission reckons, compared with just 3.9% in 2020. That figure includes Chinese groups BYD 002594.SZ and SAIC Motor but also Western brands with manufacturing operations in the country, like Tesla TSLA.O and BMW BMWG.DE. China’s sheer scale and quick EV adoption help its marques, but their success also reflects government subsidies and cheap financing.
The announcement of tariffs has done nothing to brighten European carmakers’ prospects, at least in investors’ eyes. On average, Renault, Porsche, Stellantis STLAM.MI, Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes-Benz MBGn.DE are now worth just under 6 times forward earnings, per LSEG data, with Volkswagen worth less than 3 times. Those valuation multiples have barely budged since Europe first floated tariffs in September 2023. The sector’s total value has declined by around 6% since then, compared with a 13% increase in the STOXX Europe 600 Index.
One problem is that the tariffs may be too low, and poorly targeted. The provisional levies range from 17.4% to 37.6% on imports, depending on the level of perceived subsidy and how co-operative the European Commission deems individual carmakers to have been. Because the prevailing prices in Europe are substantially higher than in China, low-cost importers have a cushion to absorb tariffs. BYD, China’s and the world’s biggest EV maker, is only facing the low end of the tariff range. Analysts at Rhodium reckon it could sell key brands like the mass-market Dolphin range at a premium to Chinese prices, even after factoring in shipping costs and a 30% tariff.
The duties may also incentivise Chinese players to set up shop in Europe, or nearby. That might be welcome news for Hungary, Turkey and other low-cost economies, but not for European carmakers. Their Chinese competitors would be encroaching on their manufacturing turf, but with greater scale and access to cheap batteries. UBS analysts reckon BYD could still enjoy a 25% cost advantage over Western players by setting up in low-cost European economies.
The bigger problem, however, is that the tariffs may hurt the European groups as much as they help. Many carmakers manufacture vehicles in China and then bring them home, such as Renault’s Dacia brand and BMW’s iX3 – in fact, campaign group Transport & Environment reckons over half of China-made EVs sold in Europe emanate from Western carmakers. That means they will have to pay the bloc’s tariffs, but without the low-cost cushion enjoyed by BYD. The European importers could either pass on the costs to customers, which would hurt their market share, or cut imports from China, making it harder to meet European EV targets. Moreover, China is likely to retaliate. Reverse tariffs on European imports could hurt firms, like Porsche and BMW, that send high-end vehicles to China.
Brussels, and other governments, could go further. One option is to impose yet more tariffs to penalise Chinese players, such as targeting batteries imported from China. Yet that might stymie the EU’s drive to decarbonise transport, given the continent’s dependence on Chinese technology. Another is to introduce bigger and more explicit subsidies for European carmakers and battery supply chains. Yet that just risks a more aggressive Chinese response.
More radically still, Europe could row back on its green targets, such as its ambition to phase out combustion engine cars by 2035. Counterintuitively, that could help Western players weather competition in EVs by preserving their profitability. But it would leave a big dent in the continent’s plan to cut overall emissions by 55% from 1990 levels by 2030. Moreover, carmakers could delay investing in greening their fleets, and end up even further behind China. Europe may be reaching the limits of what it can do.
Follow @Unmack1 on X
CONTEXT NEWS
The European Commission on July 4 announced provisional tariffs for electric vehicles imported to Europe from China.
As part of its anti-subsidy investigation, the European Commission will impose countervailing duties ranging between 17.4% and 37.6% of the price of an electric vehicle imported from China. BYD, the Middle Kingdom’s largest EV exporter, will face the lowest tariff of 17.4%.
Graphic: European carmarkers forward price earnings ratio https://reut.rs/463Py0X
Graphic: Carmakers stock performance https://reut.rs/4cV0f8h
Editing by George Hay and Oliver Taslic
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
