Pension funds rethink hedging tactics after UK crisis
'LDI' tools gain popularity two years after pensions blow-up
Providers say they are better able to absorb shocks
Value of leveraged hedging halves in two years - regulator
By Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers
LONDON, Oct 4 (Reuters) -Two years after market chaos jeopardised Britain's 2 trillion pound ($2.7 trillion) pensions industry, the hedging strategy that exacerbated the crisis is increasing in popularity - although providers say with less of the risk.
In September 2022, Britain's then-prime minister Liz Truss' 'mini-budget' promising unfunded tax cuts spooked investors, triggering a massive sell-off in UK government bonds or 'gilts'.
That had a disastrous knock-on effect for many pension funds, who were not only heavily exposed to these assets but who had also used leveraged financial instruments to hedge against sharp rate moves and inflation, under a strategy known as 'Liability Driven Investment' (LDI).
The dramatic swings in gilt prices triggered collateral calls on pension funds' LDI positions, sparking a dash by operators to fire-sell the funds' most liquid assets to raise the necessary cash.
For most funds, this meant selling off UK government debt into a rapidly tumbling market. The Bank of England was forced to step in and buy gilts to stabilise prices.
Regulators have since then been pressing for more collateral and reduced leverage to avoid a repeat of the crisis whilst recognising the role that hedging plays in protecting assets.
"LDI is as important as ever to pension schemes, if not more important as many schemes are looking to manage potential surpluses and reach their desired end game," said Adam Baker, a manager in BlackRock's BLK.N LDI business.
LDI providers said they had taken various steps to make the strategy safer, including reducing leverage and setting aside more liquid assets such as corporate bonds as collateral that can be more easily cashed in.
However, executives acknowledged the new approach remains untested and no system is immune to every shock.
'LDI 2.0'
Four of the biggest LDI providers - Legal & General LGEN.L, Insight Investment, Schroders SDR.L and Columbia Threadneedle - told Reuters that pension funds have increased their use of hedging tools including LDI.
LGIM said its defined benefit pension scheme clients had increased their hedging ratios to 86-87% of their liabilities, up as much as seven percentage points in two years, with LDI the primary method of choice.
Partly in response to tougher regulation, LGIM's pooled funds have increased the collateral available to withstand rate moves of 3 percentage points or more, up from 1.5 to 2 points pre-crisis, giving them a bigger buffer in any crisis.
"Many people call it LDI 2.0", said Legal & General Investment Management's (LGIM) Anne-Marie Morris.
Insight Investment said its clients were increasing their use of hedging, while Schroders said LDI was being deployed more by both existing and new clients, without providing data.
XPS, a pensions consultancy, said the proportion of LDI assets held across its clients had increased by 8 percentage points in two years.
At the same time, pension funds have been able to deleverage their hedging positions, partly because higher interest rates have improved their funding positions by reducing their liabilities.
Data from The Pensions Regulator (TPR) shared with Reuters showed that the value of leveraged LDI positions currently stands at 600-700 billion pounds, around half the level in late 2021, representing a reduced, but still sizeable exposure.
The regulator said it holds data on traditional assets, but not unleveraged LDI positions specifically, which could include standard gilt funds and corporate bonds, without the need to post collateral.
"Defined benefit pension schemes are better funded than at any time in recent memory," said Neil Bull, TPR's executive director of market oversight, adding TPR would continue to monitor potential LDI risks.
($1 = 0.7530 pounds)
Reporting by Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers
Editing by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes, Sinead Cruise and Elaine Hardcastle
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
