美國居民不適用 XM 服務。

Ozempic may gift US a $3 trln benefit



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>BREAKINGVIEWS- Ozempic may gift US a $3 trln benefit</title></head><body>

The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

By Robert Cyran

NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The United States spends 17% of its gross domestic product on healthcare, about twice as much as the average OECD country, according to the Commonwealth Fund. Can weight loss drugs like Ozempic help shrink that? According to a recent study, the answer is probably no. But other medical breakthroughs have temporarily changed the course of U.S. spending. There’s hope that the fattest developed country in the world can stall growth for good.

A government estimate in June concluded spending will rise 5.6% annually until 2032. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services think it will grow faster than the overall economy thanks to the aging population and poor healthcare productivity, among other things. At $22 trillion – the outlay the organization thinks the country will make by 2032 – it will account for almost 20% of GDP.

In the long arc of the United States' spending on medical treatments, that fits with the trend. Healthcare as a percentage of GDP tripled between 1960 and 2010. The hitch is that, for the last decade or so, the relative figure hasn’t budged.

Obvious suspects don’t fully explain the current slowdown. The Affordable Care Act probably helped. But medical spending growth was slowing prior to its 2010 passage, and major parts of the ACA weren’t phased in until 2016. Other effects, like the pandemic, could be transitory.

Other reasonable explanations offer some reasons for optimism. Harvard professor Joseph Newhouse pointed out people have become willing to pay for medical advances, which improve welfare. People still swallow aspirin, but now also take $100,000 cancer treatments. The onset of key drugs may have also helped. Cardiovascular spending fell dramatically from 2005 to 2012, and Harvard Professor David Cutler attributes half of that reduction to drugs such as statins.

The effects of obesity treatments from Eli Lilly LLY.N and Novo Nordisk NOVOb.CO might be similar. With list prices around $1,000 a month, the use of the drug in non-diabetic patients is probably not cost-effective. Nonprofit KFF, however, estimated the average obese health plan member’s medical spend in 2021 was $12,588 or 2.7 times as much as a non-obese member. If the net cost of the drug could be lowered to $500 a month and this reduced patients’ medical costs to that of non-obese people, that would save about 18% per obese patient, or roughly $250 billion annually based on the current population. And that could underestimate the savings. If healthcare expenditures were capped at 17% of GDP, then that would save the U.S. an estimated $2.6 trillion by 2032.

Of course, thinner patients may incur more or different medical costs. But obesity is associated with most major causes of U.S. death and illness. An ounce of cure is worth a lifetime of expense.

Follow @rob_cyran on X

CONTEXT NEWS

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Office of the Actuary releases projections for national health expenditure on June 12. They project average annual growth of 5.6% from 2023 to 2032. That is estimated to grow faster than annual growth in gross domestic product, taking health expenditure from 17.3% in 2022 to 19.7% of GDP in 2032.


Graphic: Obesity drugs may bend healthcare expenditure curve Obesity drugs may bend healthcare expenditure curve https://reut.rs/3zkxa7W


Editing by Lauren Silva Laughlin and Sharon Lam

</body></html>

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明