Nvidia has nothing to fear but a lack of fear
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, Sept 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Almost $300 billion worth of Nvidia NVDA.O got vaporized on Tuesday. It was the third sell-off in the $2.6 trillion U.S. chipmaker’s shares this year, and like the previous two, it has little basis in industrial reality. The chances are that market volatility and changeable economic data will continue to buffet Nvidia’s stock, but the biggest risk to its valuation could come later, and come from within.
Nvidia is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the race to develop artificial intelligence, as its semiconductors and networking equipment are deployed in data centers used to train and run AI systems. Revenue is expected to double this year to around $125 billion, according to analyst estimates gathered by LSEG. The outlook there hasn’t changed. Giant customers still plan to spend billions on its chips. Meta Platforms META.O, for example, intends to roughly increase its overall capital expenditure this year by around 50%, to $40 billion.
There can still be room for disappointment. The large internet and software firms that form part of its customer base may fail to monetize their AI initiatives enough to justify their $300 billion investment. At Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s plans for open AI may turn it into a commodity. But there too, nothing has changed.
There are newer threats: the U.S. Department of Justice has accelerated a probe into whether the company unfairly gave preferential pricing and chips to companies that exclusively use Nvidia and shun its rivals, according to Bloomberg. Rival chipmaker Intel INTC.O settled with U.S. regulators over similar issues over a decade ago. But such levies are rarely very damaging. Europe slapped a fine on Intel 15 years ago, yet that case is still ongoing.
If there’s something that should worry investors, it lurks further out – and Intel offers some foreshadowing. That former giant was once the chipmaker to beat. Its peak market capitalization in 2000 of roughly $500 billion is equivalent to nearly $1 trillion in today’s money. But Intel lost its manufacturing edge to specialized manufacturer TSMC 2330.TW and missed out on the shift to chips that power cellphones. Its U.S. settlement played a role, making it easier for upstarts like Nvidia. But that was at root a problem of complacency. Intel stuck to what it knew, longer than it should have.
That kind of risk is hard to price in to a company’s shares, which probably means most investors aren’t pricing it in at all. Andy Grove, Intel’s chief executive just prior to the company’s zenith, said that “only the paranoid survive”. Intel didn’t take him at his word, but Nvidia boss Jensen Huang still can.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nvida’s stock fell 9.5% on Sept. 3, wiping around $380 billion off the U.S. chipmaker’s market capitalization.
The U.S. Department of Justice sent subpoenas to Nvidia and other companies to investigate whether the chipmaker violated antitrust laws, according to a Bloomberg story on Sept. 3, released after the market closed.
The DOJ is investigating whether Nvidia’s purchase of Run: ai, a software maker, will make it more difficult for customers to use other firm’s chips, and whether Nvidia gives preferential pricing and supply of chips to customers that use Nvidia technology exclusively, according to Bloomberg.
Nvidia's shares have been a wobbly rocket ride https://reut.rs/3XchBav
Editing by John Foley and Pranav Kiran
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
