Media Matters must face X’s lawsuit over report about ads next to extremist posts
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 30 (Reuters) -A federal judge in Texas has refused to dismiss a lawsuit by Elon Musk’s social media company X accusing watchdog Media Matters of disparaging the platform in a report that said the site had placed ads for major brands next to extremist content.
In a Thursday decision, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth said X could pursue federal claims that Media Matters “knowingly and maliciously fabricated side-by-side images” of major advertisers next to neo-Nazi content, driving some companies to stop or pause their spend on the site.
O'Connor rejected Media Matter's arguments for dismissal, including that it can’t be liable for business disparagement by reporting truthful statements. O'Connor said X had sufficiently alleged that Media Matters had acted with “actual malice” based on statements criticizing the platform.
X did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Nor did Washington, D.C.-based Media Matters, a liberal advocacy group, which has called the lawsuit meritless and defended what it said was an “accurate report on the platform’s extremism.”
Ad revenue on X, formerly Twitter, fell after Musk purchased the site in 2022 for $44 billion. Musk’s X soon faced scrutiny over lax content moderation, as the site reinstated once-suspended accounts and brands grew concerned over their ads appearing next to inappropriate content.
The Media Matters report at the center of X’s lawsuit was published online in November. The organization said it found advertisements by IBM, Apple, Oracle and Comcast's Xfinity placed alongside posts touting Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party.
The report came a day after Musk in a post on X agreed with a user who falsely claimed Jewish people were stoking hatred against white people. Musk said that user was speaking "the actual truth." Musk later apologized.
X sued Media Matters in November in federal court in Fort Worth, which has become a favorite destination for conservatives seeking to block Democratic-backed policies. The lawsuit alleged the Media Matters report was published “with the intention of harming X and its business.”
In seeking dismissal, Media Matters said in a filing that O'Connor, who was appointed by former Republican President George W. Bush, held no power to hear the lawsuit in Texas because the reporting and publishing activity at issue was not tied to the state or otherwise focused on its residents.
O’Connor said the report’s "targeting" of Texas-based companies AT&T and Oracle was enough to give the court jurisdiction to consider the lawsuit.
The case is X v. Media Matters, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 4:23-cv-01175.
For X: Judd Stone of Stone Hilton and John Sullivan of SL Law
For Media Matters: Theodore Boutrous, Amer Ahmed and Andrew LeGrand of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher and Abha Khanna and Aria Branch of Elias Law Group
Read more:
Musk appeal calls defamation lawsuit over extremist street brawl 'baseless'
Media Matters loses bid to force judge's recusal in X's lawsuit
Texas judge in lawsuit by Musk's X against advertisers exits case
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
