美國居民不適用 XM 服務。

LME open-outcry trade lives on as SocGen quit sparks no rush for exits



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>ANALYSIS-LME open-outcry trade lives on as SocGen quit sparks no rush for exits</title></head><body>

By Eric Onstad

LONDON, Aug 28 (Reuters) -The future of ring trading on the London Metal Exchange looks assured for now after almost all the firms involved told Reuters they remained committed to open-outcry trading at one of the last venues to still support it.

But with critical mass dropping towards the level at which LME management has said it would suspend the process after Societe Generale said last week it would no longer take part, its longer term outlook is less sure.

The ring has its roots in the early 19th century when the Royal Exchange, the world’s first commodities market, became so crowded that metal merchants gathered at the Jerusalem coffee house on Cornhill in the City to conduct business.

In the 1980s, about 30 firms dealt in the LME ring, which features a circle of padded red leather seats for traders who use arcane hand signals during five-minute bursts of intense trading in copper, aluminium and other metals.

Now, just seven participants remain, and the LME has said the floor will close if the number of ring members falls below six, or if their trading in the second ring falls to less than 75% of last year's level.

The LME, owned by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd 0388.HK, said on Friday that trading volumes remain above the 75% threshold, but did not say by how much. It declined to comment further.

Several sources said high costs for ring-dealing firms and a global trend towards electronic trade threaten to undermine the minimum number of participants required to keep the age-old trading method afloat.

The loss of the ring, which involves four sessions of trading a day, would be a blow for miners and industrial firms that value floor trading.

They regard open-outcry dealing, used to crystalise official prices for physical deals using a complex structure of multiple forward dates, as absent of speculative influences.

For years, there has been tension between traditional physical users and the financial community that includes hedge funds, speculators and Commodity Trade Advisor investment funds and funds driven by algorithmic programmes.

Many long-standing users see a risk too that an excess of computer-driven speculative flows can distort prices that are key to deals in physical metal.

"It's that second ring close, the official price, that's void of algos, void of CTAs, void of specs, that still has an appeal," said Marc Bailey, CEO of ring-trader Sucden Financial.


QUESTIONS OVER VIABILITY

An outcry from physical LME users saved the ring three years ago when the 147-year-old LME proposed to close the trading floor and join the bulk of other financial exchanges that have moved to pure electronic trading.

The exchange argued that a temporary switch to full digital trading during COVID-19 proved that the ring was not essential.

But the LME eventually compromised and now operates on a hybrid basis, using open-outcry trading for official prices used by physical users as benchmarks for their deals and an electronic system for closing prices.

Longstanding questions about the viability of the ring resurfaced on Aug. 23 when Societe Generale SOGN.PA said it would drop the top-tier membership that allows floor trading.

A Reuters survey showed there is still a commitment to the ring for now by the bulk of existing ring members, backed by miners and companies that use physical metal.

"There are enough people that still want an independent price for physical trading," said Sucden's Bailey.

Marex Group MRX.O also said it would continue ring trading, while StoneX Financial SNEX.O said it had no current plans to change its approach to the ring.

Sources with direct knowledge said Amalgamated Metal Trading, CCBI Global Markets and GF Financial also planned to continue on the LME floor, while Sigma Broking declined to comment.

Ring members must bear the extra cost of having traders both in the office and on the LME floor, which can cost $1 million a year, one industry source estimated.

"It's expensive to maintain, but we're still making money from the ring," said an executive of a ring dealer who declined to be named.


SMALL PLAYER

SocGen was a relatively small player in the ring, and one LME executive estimated the company accounted for only 6% of open-outcry trading. An executive at an LME ring dealer said they expected its ring business to be redistributed to one or more of the remaining brokers.

Some LME members argue that electronic trading worked during COVID-19 and a full shift is inevitable.

"The writing is in the wall," said an industry source. "The ring is actually irrelevant, as those prices were compiled electronically during COVID and no one noticed any difference."

But the ring still has support. One executive at a European company that buys LME metals to make its products said the exchange should create a more viable ring by coming up with more cost-efficient solution.

"Without the ring, the LME is just another raw materials exchange," he said.



Reporting by Eric Onstad; Editing by Veronica Brown and Jan Harvey

</body></html>

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明