Lawyers in PFAS water pollution settlements win $956 mln fee award
By Clark Mindock
April 23 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Tuesday awarded over $956 million in legal fees to plaintiffs’ lawyers who secured two settlements worth more than $11 billion with major manufacturers of toxic “forever chemicals” on behalf of public water systems.
U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel in Charleston, South Carolina, granted unopposed fee requests after 3M MMM.N, DuPont de Nemours Inc DD.N, Chemours CC.N and Corteva CTVA.N last year agreed to resolve claims that their products polluted drinking water in the United States with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS.
PFAS are a class of thousands of chemicals used in firefighting foams, nonstick pans and stain resistant fabrics. They have been linked to cancer and other diseases and are often called forever chemicals because they do not easily break down in nature or the human body.
Last year, 3M agreed to a PFAS-related settlement with public water systems worth $10.3 billion, while the other companies agreed to a settlement worth $1.19 billion. The companies did not admit to wrongdoing as part of the deals.
The attorneys' award represents 8% of the two settlements plus roughly $21 million in out-of-pocket expenses. The litigation has been led by the law firms Napoli Shkolnik, Douglas & London, Baron & Budd, Motley Rice and FeganScott.
“This has indeed been a long-fought case, and it's been years of dedicated work without compensation for many involved,” Paul Napoli of Napoli Shkolnik said in an email.
The award will be dispersed in stages as the settlements are paid out, and a special master will determine how the funds are distributed between firms.
Roughly 26,000 water systems across the country will use the rest of the settlement money to test for and treat PFAS contamination, which is now mandated under a new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rule issued this month.
The law firms represent water systems in several other active cases against different chemical companies in Gergel's court, one of which is due to go to trial in October. Companies also face thousands of personal injury lawsuits and cases filed by states and property owners.
The case is In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation, U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, case No. 2:18-mn-02873.
For the plaintiffs: Paul Napoli of Napoli Shkolnik; Michael London of Douglas & London; Scott Summy of Baron & Budd; and Elizabeth Fegan of Fegan Scott.
For 3M: Richard Bulger, Daniel Ring and Michael Olsen of Mayer Brown
For DuPont: Molly Craig of the Hood Law Firm and David Erickson of Shook Hardy and Bacon
Read More:
'Forever chemicals’ were everywhere in 2023. Expect more litigation in 2024
Reporting by Clark Mindock
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
