Japan Airlines expects no flight cancellations from A350 inspections
Updates with additional Rolls-Royce comment in paragraph 3, details on engine fuel nozzle supplier in paragraphs 13-16
By Lisa Barrington and Tim Hepher
SEOUL, Sept 6 (Reuters) -Japan Airlines 9201.T does not expect flight cancellations or delays as a result of inspections ordered by Europe's air safety regulator on engines of Airbus AIR.PA A350-1000 jets, it said on Friday.
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency said on Thursday Trent XWB-97 engines made by Rolls-Royce RR.L should be checked after an engine fire during the flight of a Cathay Pacific 0293.HK jetliner.
"Working with our customers and our supply chain, we are confident in our ability to deliver on the inspection regime," Rolls-Royce said.
Airlines had questioned Airbus and Rolls-Royce in briefings on Thursday about the availability of parts, a person briefed on the matter said.
Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific 0293.HK cancelled a number of flightsthis week while it checked and repaired A350 engines after a Zurich-bound jet was forced to return to Hong Kong on Monday due to the engine problem, later traced to a fuel leak.
EASA gave airlines between three and 30 days to carry out visual checks and measurements on flexible fuel hose connections inside the A350-1000 engines. The smaller A350-900 variant is not subject to the order.
Japan Airlines (JAL) inspected its entire fleet of A350-1000 and A350-900 jets earlier this week, but said it would need to conduct additional inspections in accordance with the EASA directive and service instructions from Rolls-Royce.
"No issues were found on any aircraft," JAL said in a statement.
Qatar Airways, which operates the largest number of A350-1000 jets, said on Friday it was carrying out inspections after it received the directives.
Etihad Airways, which has five A350-1000 jets, said it began inspecting engines proactively before the directive was issued and continues to do so in compliance with directive.
"Etihad has discovered no issues, nor experienced any similar events with the engine, so does not anticipate any impact on its operations," it said in a statement.
British Airways and Virgin Atlantic, both of which operate A350-1000 jets, did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
TECHNICAL CLARITY
Industry sources said the parts are made by Parker Hannifin PH.N, a leading supplier of specialist fuel and other systems.
The Parker Aerospace unit announced in 2008 it had won contracts to supply the fuel and hydraulic systems for the A350 aircraft including equipment to handle "engine feed". Part numbers listed by EASA for inspection had the prefix PH.
Parker Hannifin did not immediately respond to a request for comment following the publication of EASA's directive.
Asked about the affected parts earlier this week, a company spokesperson said: "If called upon, we are ready to offer our support of the investigation of this matter."
Cathay Pacific said on Friday that maintenance activity on its A350 fleet "continues to progress well" and will wrap up by Saturdayas expected.
Accident investigators in Hong Kong, where Cathay is based, are still investigating the incident.
Broker Jefferies said in a note to clients on Friday it considered the engine issue was unlikely to be widespread, and said no significant regulatory action had been taken.
"With the faulty part in question now confirmed as a fuel nozzle/hose, any work required on the engines, if found to be faulty, should be fairly limited and a quick fix... This implies only minor costs for Rolls-Royce," it said.
Additional reporting by Maki Shiraki, Andrew Mills, Allison Lampert and Joanna Plucinska; Editing by David Goodman, Emelia Sithole-Matarise and Jan Harvey
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
