美國居民不適用 XM 服務。

Google privacy lawsuits pile up after court denies class action



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Google privacy lawsuits pile up after court denies class action</title></head><body>

By Mike Scarcella

July 17 (Reuters) -Law firms Boies Schiller Flexner and Morgan & Morgan have flooded California courts with thousands of lawsuits accusing Google of violating users' privacy rights, after a U.S. judge said they could not pursue a class action seeking billions of dollars.

In a court filing on Tuesday, the law firms disclosed they are representing 96,000 clients in nearly 2,000 cases filed in California state court since March.

The lawsuits, which seek monetary damages against Google, mirror the claims in a federal case filed in Oakland in 2020 that accused Google of unlawfully collecting, storing and using consumers’ browsing data while they used the company’s private browsing mode called “Incognito.”

Google agreed last year to settle the federal case while denying the claims. The company said it would destroy billions of data records of consumers who thought they were surfing the web privately. But the deal, which did not create a settlement fund, allowed for individual lawsuits seeking money damages.

Google in a statement on Wednesday said “these copycat complaints are meritless and we will defend ourselves vigorously.”

Attorneys for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The federal settlement is pending court approval. Google has balked at the plaintiffs’ law firms' request for $217 million in legal fees for their work.

The firms had sought class action status to represent millions of Google consumers seeking more than $5 billion in damages. A federal judge last year declined to certify a class action for money damages, and an appeals court refused to review the order.

Boies Schiller and Morgan & Morgan said they secured a “tolling" agreement with Google that would bar the tech company from arguing that the individuals’ claims in state court were filed too late.

Another law firm, Potter Handy, told the judge overseeing the federal case that it is representing 70,000 clients in related privacy cases filed against Google since April.

An attorney at the firm involved in the litigation did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.

Read more:

Google slams opposing lawyers’ $217 million fee bid in privacy case

Google to destroy browsing data to settle consumer privacy lawsuit

Google 'Incognito' users lose appeal to sue for damages as class



Reporting by Mike Scarcella

</body></html>

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明