EU top court should reject Air France-KLM cartel fine appeal, court adviser says
By Foo Yun Chee
BRUSSELS, Sept 5 (Reuters) -Europe's top court should reject an appeal by Air France KLM AIRF.PA and its Dutch unit KLM, British Airways ICAG.L, Singapore Airlines SIAL.SI and some of their peers against cartel fines imposed by EU antitrust regulators in 2017, an adviser to the court said on Thursday.
The European Commission seven years ago reissued fines totalling 776 million euros to 11 airlines for taking part in a cartel to fix air cargo prices, after the Luxembourg-based General Court scrapped its first decision levied in 2010 due to a procedural error.
The carriers took their grievance back to the lower tribunal which threw out their challenges in 2022, prompting them to appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
The court's judges should dismiss their appeals, CJEU Advocate General Athanasios Rantos said in a non-binding opinion, as he sided with the EU competition enforcer.
He said SAS' SAS.ST appeal for a cut in its fine should be referred back to the General Court to be reviewed.
The CJEU, which usually follows the majority of such recommendations, will rule in the coming months.
Air France-KLM's fine was the highest at 182.9 million euros, followed by KLM at 127.1 million. Lufthansa LHAG.DE, which avoided a fine after it alerted the EU watchdog to the cartel, had also appealed the decision because it disagreed with the Commission's legal arguments.
The EU watchdog said the cartel fixed air freight services, fuel and security surcharges from December 1999 to February 2006.
The other airlines which appealed the EU fines are Air Canada AC.TO, Japan Airlines 9201.T, Cathay Pacific Airways 0293.HK, Latam Airlines Group and its subsidiary Lan Cargo, and Cargolux CLUX.UL.
The cases are C-367/22 P Air Canada v Commission, C-369/22 P Air France v Commission, C-370/22 P Air France-KLM v Commission, C-375/22 P LATAM Airlines Group and Lan Cargo v Commission, C-378/22 P British Airways v Commission, C-379/22 P Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission, C-380/22 P Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission, C-381/22 P Japan Airlines v Commission, C-382/22 P Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission, C-385/22 P Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission, C-386/22 P Martinair Holland v Commission, C-401/22 P Cargolux Airlines v Commission and C-403/22 P SAS Cargo Group and Others v Commission.
Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Hugh Lawson
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
