Companies ask US judiciary group to force lawsuit funding disclosures
Adds comment in paragraphs 11, 12 from funding advocate
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 3 (Reuters) -More than 100 major companies from the technology, pharmaceutical, automotive and other sectors have urged the U.S. judiciary to adopt a nationwide rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding in lawsuits.
Companies including Amazon.com, Google, Cisco, Meta, Comcast, Exxon, Zurich, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Ford, Pfizer and Novartis submitted the letter on Wednesday to the federal courts’ Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, in advance of a hearing by the committee next week.
Litigation funding, where a financier backs clients' cases in exchange for a cut of an eventual settlement or judgment, has become a multibillion-dollar industry in recent years.
Some U.S. courts require disclosure of outside funding, but there is no uniformity across the judiciary.
The companies either had no immediate comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter, which was organized by defense-focused Lawyers for Civil Justice.
Some of the signatories have previously expressed concern about litigation funding and the need for greater oversight. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups have for years called on standardizing funding disclosure rules.
The Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform submitted a letter on Wednesday to the advisory committee urging greater oversight, and Republican U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis expressed a similar view.
The companies’ letter said disclosures about financial backers in cases are necessary to allow defendants to make informed decisions about the course of litigation. They said outside funding “fundamentally alters the dynamics and has a major impact on whether the dispute can be resolved through settlement.”
Christopher Bogart, chief executive of litigation funder Burford Capital, in a statement on Thursday questioned the motives of the companies that signed onto the letter and rejected their call for mandatory disclosures.
"What they want is to keep their unfair advantage in the justice system and to drive up costs for anyone who sues them – which is exactly what they do whenever they find out about the identity of a litigation funder,” Bogart said.
The International Legal Finance Association, a Washington, D.C. group that advocates for the funding industry, in a statement on Thursday criticized the drive for a nationwide disclosure rule.
"These companies yet again are attempting to further tilt the justice system in their own favor by forcing their challengers to disclose privileged information about their legal strategies," Shannon Campagna, the group's acting executive director, said.
The judiciary's civil rules advisory committee is meeting on Oct. 10 in Washington, D.C. The panel said its agenda includes a discussion of amending court rules to require disclosure of litigation funding. No formal proposal is up for a vote.
A representative for the committee declined to comment.
The committee last discussed litigation funding in late 2021.
Read more:
Louisiana law places new rules on litigation funders
Litigation funder Burford fights order denying bid to take over Sysco cases
US litigation funding in 'state of flux' as deal commitments dip, says report
Litigation funders deployed $3.2 bln in U.S. investments last year - report
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
