Breakup alarm rings at $50 bln building superstore
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
NEW YORK, May 29 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The cold wind blowing through Johnson Controls International JCI.N is not from its heavy-duty air conditioners, but instead from pushy investors who could call time on boss George Oliver’s tenure leading the $50 billion industrial conglomerate. The biggest issue: a merger he helped orchestrate eight years ago has turned out to be mostly hot air.
Oliver became chief executive soon after Johnson Controls acquired Tyco, the company he was running, for about $17 billion. Tax avoidance played a role, relocating the U.S. buyer’s headquarters to lower-rate Ireland. The duo also promised revenue uplifts from cross-selling heating and cooling with fire sprinklers and video surveillance.
The results have been underwhelming. Since 2019, the year after Johnson Controls sold its car-battery division for $13 billion, the remodeled company’s compound annual top-line growth has been less than 3%, compared to a five-year average of about 7% for companies tracked by the S&P 500 Index .SPX, according to FactSet. Its total shareholder return, including reinvested dividends, of about 100% since Oliver became CEO broadly tracks with fellow building-security providers. But rivals in heating, ventilation and air conditioning Lennox International LII.N and Trane Technologies have generated returns of 200% and 400%, respectively, over the same span.
These disparities help explain the arrival of aggressive fund managers Elliott Management and Soroban Capital. They have not said what they want. Given the company’s performance, however, it would hardly be surprising to see a push to replace Oliver, or even for a breakup that effectively unpicks the Tyco transaction.
For now, Oliver is sticking to his one-stop shop idea. He wants Johnson Controls to secure higher-margin service deals for as much as 90% of its commercial contracts, up from nearly half now, while offloading a quarter of the company’s existing portfolio, probably residential HVAC. The premise is to persuade investors to regard the company more like elevator operator Otis Worldwide OTIS.N, which trades near 17 times anticipated EBITDA over the next year, using estimates compiled by LSEG.
Looked at another way, climate-control peers command valuation multiples of about 18 times. Despite Johnson Controls deriving half its earnings from commercial heating and cooling, according to Wolfe Research analysts, it trades closer to the 13 times at which fire and security specialists trade. The valuation gap is even more vexing given the construction frenzy in data centers, which have substantial cooling needs. Updated energy-efficiency rules also will prompt additional spending on new and existing buildings.
Instead of fully capitalizing on these upswings, Oliver has been trying to justify the lackluster Tyco deal. For all the warning sensors Johnson Controls produces, it failed to detect the risks of the strategy.
Follow @jgfarb on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Activist hedge fund Elliott Management has accumulated a stake worth more than $1 billion in Johnson Controls International, which installs cooling and security systems in buildings, according to a Bloomberg report on May 19, citing unnamed sources. Fellow pushy investor Soroban Capital also has amassed a position in the company worth more than $500 million, Bloomberg reported a day later.
Johnson Controls fails to heat up investor returns Johnson Controls fails to heat up investor returns https://reut.rs/3X3MvDA
Editing by Jonathan Guilford and Pranav Kiran
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
