美國居民不適用 XM 服務。

Amneal, US FTC win order removing Teva inhaler patents from FDA list



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Amneal, US FTC win order removing Teva inhaler patents from FDA list</title></head><body>

By Blake Brittain

June 10 (Reuters) -Drugmaker Amneal Pharmaceuticals AMRX.O with the backing of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission convinced a New Jersey federal court on Monday to remove five Teva Pharmaceutical TEVA.TA patents from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration list of patents covering Teva's breathing drug ProAir HFA.

U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler agreed with Amneal and the FTC that Teva's patents only covered inhaler device technology, ordering it to remove the listings from the FDA's Orange Book and clearing an obstacle for Amneal's proposed generic.

The decision follows the FTC's warnings to drugmakers including Teva over the misuse of Orange Book patent listings to wrongly extend patent monopolies on brand-name drugs. Chesler on Monday also rejected Teva's bid to dismiss Amneal's allegations that Teva violated state and federal antitrust law.

Spokespeople for Teva, Amneal and the FTC did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision.

Teva sued Amneal for patent infringement last year based on its proposed generic version of ProAir HFA, which treats bronchial spasms caused by diseases like asthma. Teva stopped making ProAir HFA in 2022.

Amneal counterclaimed that Teva had improperly submitted the patents to the Orange Book, which lists patents that cover drugs that the FDA has deemed safe and effective.

The FTC last year sent notices to Teva and other drugmakersdisputing 110 of their Orange Book patents, and said the companies may have improperly submitted them to the FDA to delay generic competition. The commission filed a brief supporting Amneal in the New Jersey case.

Chesler agreed with Amneal and the FTC that Teva's patents only cover parts of a "metered inhaler device" and "do not claim or even mention" ProAir HFA.

The case is Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 2:23-cv-20964.

For Teva: Daryl Wiesen and Natasha Daughtrey of Goodwin Procter

For Amneal: Rebekah Conroy of Stone Conroy; Steven Maddox and Jeremy Edwards of Procopio


Read more:

US FTC warns drugmakers over patent listings

US FTC disputes over 100 medical patents listed with FDA including asthma inhalers


</body></html>

免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務,允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容,但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限,並受以下條款與條例約束:(i)條款與條例;(ii)風險提示;(iii)完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊,僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意,我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成,也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。

所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料,僅適用於教育/資訊類用途,不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議,或是交易價格紀錄,或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。

本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容,包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接,皆爲‘按原狀’,並作爲一般市場評論所提供,而非投資建議。請理解和接受,所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容,並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性,而根據法律要求所編寫,而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊,相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。

風險提示:您的資金存在風險。槓桿商品並不適合所有客戶。請詳細閱讀我們的風險聲明