Amazon dresses up its drab fashion with Saks stake
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Jennifer Saba
NEW YORK, July 10 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Amazon.com AMZN.O boss Andy Jassy is sharply pairing a tailored blazer with cheap cargo pants. The e-commerce goliath agreed to back Saks Fifth Avenue’s deal to buy rival swanky department store operator Neiman Marcus at the same time it’s considering a competitor to bargain clothing vendors Shein and Temu. A high-low approach should dress things up.
The $2 trillion company has had a hard time finding the right fit. Amazon accounts for 35% of U.S. apparel e-commerce sales this year, or about $60 billion of gross market value, research outfit eMarketer estimates. It claims about 60% of the office equipment and supplies market and half in computers and electronics.
There’s plenty of upside for Amazon. Luxury attire is far more profitable while fast fashion’s popularity looks sustainable. The Shein and Temu apps were both among the 10 most downloaded in May, according to Sensor Tower.
HBC, the parent company of Saks, said over the July 4 U.S. holiday that it would pay $2.7 billion for Neiman’s namesake chain and its luxe Bergdorf Goodman shops, a long-mooted deal as high-end merchants struggle to cater to online shoppers. Neiman Marcus also emerged from bankruptcy in 2020 only to encounter pressure from suppliers LVMH LVMH.PA and Richemont CFR.S. Joining forces with Saks in theory provides extra heft to negotiate on behalf of 150 locations with a combined $10 billion in annual sales.
Amazon’s investment is more promising than other recent initiatives. Four years ago, it opened Luxury Stores with Oscar de la Renta and sells pricey secondhand purses in partnership with What Goes Around Comes Around. The efforts haven’t taken off, evidenced by the deeper selection of designers available on the Saks and Neiman Marcus sites.
Moreover, Amazon’s business model clashes with reality because it seeks to keep a grip on pricing, customer data and brands. Makers of upscale goods have their own ideas and want to steer well clear of inexpensive alternatives. Having a stake in the newly created Saks Global arm, assuming trustbusters don’t intervene, should give Amazon a clearer window into how richer consumers shop, important insight considering that just 2% of customers account for half of all luxury industry revenue, according to analysts at TD Securities.
The lower end of the market is a bigger threat. Partly by exploiting U.S. tax loopholes, Shein and Temu are posing fresh challenges to Amazon, helping explain why it may start its own channel of Chinese vendors shipping directly to customers, per CNBC. As any fashionista knows, chic and affordable is often a winning combo.
Follow @jennifersaba on X
CONTEXT NEWS
HBC, the parent company of Saks Fifth Avenue, said on July 4 it had agreed to buy rival Neiman Marcus for $2.7 billion with plans to combine the upscale department store chains into a new group separate from its Hudson’s Bay business.
Saks Global also will include Saks Off 5th and Bergdorf Goodan, each of which will operate under their respective brands.
As part of the deal, Amazon.com and Salesforce will become investors in Saks Global. HBC said it had secured a $1.2 billion term loan from Apollo Global Management and a $2 billion revolving loan facility from Bank of America, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, RBC Capital Markets and Wells Fargo.
M. Klein & Co and Solomon Partners are advising HBC. JPMorgan and Lazard are advising Neiman Marcus.
Graphic: Amazon's share of US e-commerce sales https://reut.rs/3XW9FfN
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Sharon Lam
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
