Activist investors mount record number of campaigns but win fewer board seats
By Svea Herbst-Bayliss
NEW YORK, July 1 (Reuters) -Activist investors mounted campaigns at a record number of companies globally during the first six months of 2024 but have been less successful in breaking into boardrooms as companies fought back effectively, data from Barclays shows.
Recent notable examples include Elliott Investment Management's targeting of Southwest Airlines LUV.N, while Starboard Value is taking on design software maker Autodesk ADSK.O and Jana Partners is pushing for changes at silicon carbide maker Wolfspeed WOLF.N.
The surge in activity may lead to more costly battles between activist shareholders and management over leadership changes, spin-offs and outright sales in the coming months, bankers, lawyers and investors said.
But uncertainty surrounding when interest rate cuts might come, geopolitical turmoil and a looming U.S. presidential election that could spell big changes in regulatory regimes, could also make corporate fights tougher.
"We are seeing more activity but fewer transactions and that means activist investors may have to dig in and stay around for longer," said Jim Rossman, global head of shareholder advisory at Barclays.
In the first half of the year, Barclays tracked 147 activist campaigns, toppling the previous record of 143 set during the first six months of 2018.
In the second quarter, 86 campaigns were launched, fueling the feverish pace. Elliott was the busiest activist, launching 11 new campaigns this year and committing some $11 billion in capital, the data showed.
While not every campaign is about board seats, the number won provides a good measure of how well companies are defending themselves. During the first half, dissidents won 74 seats, down from 93 in the same period a year ago though prominent activists put in a strong showing in reaching agreements to join boards.
In U.S. proxy fights, activists won only 11% of the seats they sought, down from 65% during the same time in 2023.
Management often persuaded shareholders that current leaders were already pursuing the right strategy and that their board directors were more qualified than the activists' nominees.
For example, hedge funds Trian Fund Management and Blackwells Capital lost their high-profile fights to seat nominees at entertainment giant Disney DIS.N and shareholders at wireless tower owner Crown Castle CCI.N rejected co-founder Ted Miller's appeal to elect him and others to the company's board.
Last year, the average activist had returns of 18%, according to Hedge Fund Research, which may have prompted newcomers to try their hand at corporate fights. Returns for the first five months of 2024, however, have been flat.
Veteran activists including Elliott, which joined the Crown Castle CCI.N board, and Carl Icahn, who was handed two seats at JetBlue JBLU.O, are still securing directorships. The Barclays data showed 24 seats were obtained by "major activist hedge funds" in the first half, compared with 29 in all of 2023.
Pushing for change at tech firms, such as Sachem Head Capital Management's success in joining the board at cloud communications firm Twilio TWLO.N this year, remained a popular trend.
But bankers, lawyers and investors also say some investors are shifting their focus to industrial companies.
Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; Editing by Edwina Gibbs
免責聲明: XM Group提供線上交易平台的登入和執行服務，允許個人查看和/或使用網站所提供的內容，但不進行任何更改或擴展其服務和訪問權限，並受以下條款與條例約束：（i）條款與條例；（ii）風險提示；（iii）完全免責聲明。網站內部所提供的所有資訊，僅限於一般資訊用途。請注意，我們所有的線上交易平台內容並不構成，也不被視為進入金融市場交易的邀約或邀請 。金融市場交易會對您的投資帶來重大風險。
所有缐上交易平台所發佈的資料，僅適用於教育/資訊類用途，不包含也不應被視爲適用於金融、投資稅或交易相關諮詢和建議，或是交易價格紀錄，或是任何金融商品或非應邀途徑的金融相關優惠的交易邀約或邀請。
本網站的所有XM和第三方所提供的内容，包括意見、新聞、研究、分析、價格其他資訊和第三方網站鏈接，皆爲‘按原狀’，並作爲一般市場評論所提供，而非投資建議。請理解和接受，所有被歸類為投資研究範圍的相關内容，並非爲了促進投資研究獨立性，而根據法律要求所編寫，而是被視爲符合營銷傳播相關法律與法規所編寫的内容。請確保您已詳讀並完全理解我們的非獨立投資研究提示和風險提示資訊，相關詳情請點擊 這裡查看。
