VW factory threat stress-tests Germany's economic model
Industrial consensus key part of German model
Volkswagen plant closure threat breaks taboos
Ruling coalition struggling to agree policy
By Maria Martinez and John O'Donnell
BERLIN, Sept 6 (Reuters) -Having lost cheap energy from Russia and facing uncertainty over its once-lucrative trade ties with China, big German business is now facing a crunch point over a third ingredient in its long-time formula for success - consensual industrial relations.
Together, Germany's industry leaders, trade unions and politicians for decades sought and found agreement over production and labour decisions that in turn provided the underpinning for the country's post-war economic development.
Volkswagen's VOWG_p.DE taboo-breaking threat to shutter German factories for the first time ever is a direct test of whether that consensus model can survive and still deliver in a global environment some see as existentially challenging.
"De-industrialisation is happening in Germany," Volkswagen works council head Daniela Cavallo said this week, demanding solutions to ensure "there will still be industrial jobs in Germany in the future".
Manufacturing still accounts for 27% of total employment in Germany - down from 32% from 20 years ago, International Labour Organisation figures show, but still a far larger share than in most advanced economies.
About 120,000 of the VW brand's 200,000-strong workforce is in Germany.
The same consensual structures for labour relations that over the years have bought industrial peace and provided job security will now be put to work in negotiations between management and unions due to start next week.
Those talks take place as Volkswagen and other legacy European car giants, including Stellantis and Renault, struggle with high labour and energy costs as well as rising competition from lower-cost Asian rivals shipping more cars to the region.
The fact that worker representatives have half the votes on VW's supervisory board make it hard for the group to force closures. Union leaders want a negotiated solution but management say the scale of the challenges means something has to give.
"If we carry on like this, we won't succeed in the transformation," Chief Financial Officer Arno Antlitz told workers at the carmaker's Wolfsburg headquarters.
"It is our joint responsibility to improve the cost efficiency of the German sites."
IG Metall has said it could consider moving to a four-day week as an alternative to closures - a move put in place in the 1990s for over a decade as part of an earlier cost-cutting drive that included smaller cuts in pay. Volkswagen has remained tight-lipped on whether this could work in today's environment.
TIME IS TIGHT
A separate strand is what role the state should have.
There is a lack of public investment to help develop markets, said Olaf Lies, economy minister of Lower Saxony, where Volkswagen's headquarters and most of the factories affected by the end of the job security programme are based.
The state is also Volkswagen's second-biggest shareholder, and holds two of the 20 seats on its supervisory board.
"This is putting many companies, and therefore Germany as a place to do business, in a very difficult situation," Lies told Reuters.
This has not escaped the notice of Chancellor Olaf Scholz's coalition in Berlin. "Anything to do with industrial production which goes away will not come back," a source inside the coalition told Reuters.
Both Economy Minister Robert Habeck and Finance Minister Christian Lindner acknowledge Germany faces structural problems as a business location, but they differ on what to do - even down to what role electric vehicles play in Germany's future.
While Habeck - from the ecologist Greens - said politicians must offer state guarantees to support the transition to EVs, Lindner - a pro-market Free Democrat - this week described "the fixation" with EVs as a mistake and rejected government measures to help the sector.
Scholz's unpopular coalition, whose component parties have just been battered by the far-right in east German regional votes, faces a general election next year. The Volkswagen move piles pressure on them to finally set clear policy, some argue.
"If such an industrial heavyweight really does have to tighten its austerity programme and close plants, it is perhaps an overdue wake-up call that the economic policy measures taken so far need to be significantly increased," said Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING.
Volkswagen is not alone. Thyssenkrupp TKAG.DE, which for decades avoided a major restructuring at its steel division due to stiff labour opposition, has also changed tack.
Its new CEO Miguel Lopez has departed from the strategy of predecessors which kept relations with IG Metall stable to demand a comprehensive revamp he says has been long overdue.
Likewise, chemical giant BASF BASFn.DE CEO Markus Kamieth said a series of plants have competitive difficulties. "We must therefore also consider further plant closures."
For now, however, even those who argue that German businesses have been far too late to spot trends in the global economy and react quickly insist it is too early to call the demise of Deutschland AG and its industrial heavyweights.
"We need forward-thinking ideas," said Christiane Benner, chair of IG Metall nationwide. "VW has survived difficult situations before."
Industry still at work Industry still at work https://reut.rs/3UZ4Lwq
German industry still running German industry still running https://reut.rs/3K1t6vx
Steady decline of industrial production https://reut.rs/3QLTc9s
FACTBOX-Which Volkswagen factories in Germany could be hit by layoffs or closed? nL1N3KN0GO
EXPLAINER-Volkswagen Law: the unique structure behind the German carmaker's labour clash nL8N3KL12O
Reporting by Maria Martinez, John O'Donell, Christoph Steitz, Rene Wagner, Ludwig Burger, Andreas Rinke, Patricia Weiss, Tom Kaeckenhoff; Editing by Mark John and Hugh Lawson
İlgili varlıklar
En son haberler
Bildirim: XM Group şirketlerinin her biri yalnızca gerçekleştirme hizmeti ve online yatırım platformumuza erişim sağlar. Herhangi bir kişinin web sitesinde bulunan veya web sitesi üzerinden sağlanan içeriği görüntülemesine ve/veya kullanmasına izin vermek, bu hizmeti değiştirmek veya genişletmek amaçlı değildir ve bu hizmeti ne değiştirir ne de genişletir. Bu tür erişim ve kullanım her zaman şunlara tabidir: (i) Şartlar ve Koşullar; (ii) Risk Uyarıları ve (iii) Tam Bildirim. Bu nedenle bu tür içerikler yalnızca genel bilgi amacıyla sağlanır. Özellikle, online yatırım platformumuzun içeriklerinin finans piyasalarında herhangi bir işleme girmek için bir teşvik veya bir teklif olmadığını lütfen dikkate alın. Herhangi bir finans piyasasında yatırım yapmak sermayeniz için önemli düzeyde risk taşır.
Online yatırım platformumuzda yayınlanan tüm materyaller yalnızca eğitim/bilgilendirme amaçlıdır ve finansal tavsiye, yatırım vergisi veya yatırım tavsiyesi ve önerileri ya da yatırım fiyatlarımızın kaydı veya herhangi bir finansal enstrümanda işlem yapılması için bir teklif veya teşvik ya da talep edilmemiş finansal promosyonları içermez ve içerdiği şeklinde bir değerlendirme yapılmamalıdır.
Görüşler, haberler, araştırma, analizler, fiyatlar, diğer bilgiler veya bu web sitesinde bulunan üçüncü taraf sitelere verilen bağlantılar gibi her türlü üçüncü taraf içeriğin yanı sıra XM tarafından hazırlanan içerik de “olduğu gibi” esasına göre, genel piyasa yorumu olarak sağlanır ve bir yatırım tavsiyesi oluşturmaz. Herhangi bir içeriğin yatırım araştırması olarak yorumlanmasıyla ilgili olarak, içeriğin bağımsız yatırım araştırmasını desteklemek üzere tasarlanmış yasal gerekliliklere uygun hazırlanmadığını ve bu amacın güdülmediğini, aynı şekilde ilgili yasalar ve mevzuatlar kapsamında pazarlama iletişimi olarak değerlendirileceğini dikkate almalı ve kabul etmelisiniz. Buradan erişebileceğiniz Bağımsız Olmayan Yatırım Araştırması Bildirimimizi ve yukarıdaki bilgilerle ilgili Risk Uyarımızı okuduğunuzdan ve anladığınızdan emin olun.
