XM tillhandahåller inte tjänster till personer bosatta i USA.

Bayer wins US legal victory against Roundup cancer claims; shares surge



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 4-Bayer wins US legal victory against Roundup cancer claims; shares surge</title></head><body>

Adds discussion of potential Supreme Court appeals in paragraphs 11-12

By Jonathan Stempel

Aug 16 (Reuters) -Bayer BAYGn.DE won a legal victory in its fight to limit liability from claims its Roundup weed killer causes cancer, as a U.S. appeals court said on Thursday that federal law shields the German company from a lawsuit by a Pennsylvania landscaper.

Shares of Bayer rose as much as 13.2% in Friday trading in Germany, on optimism the decision could eliminate much of its remaining legal liabilities for Roundup, made by its Monsanto unit.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia rejected plaintiff David Schaffner's claim that Monsanto violated state law by failing to put a cancer warning on the label for Roundup.

Schaffner was diagnosed in 2006 with a kind of cancer called non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a common claim for Roundup plaintiffs.

He and his wife Theresa sued Bayer in 2019, partly over how his illness affected their relationship.

Chief Judge Michael Chagares wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act requires nationwide uniformity in pesticide labels, and prevented Pennsylvania from adding a cancer warning.


COURTS ARE DIVIDED

The decision conflicts with rulings from federal appeals courts in San Francisco and Atlanta in similar cases.

That raises the prospect the U.S. Supreme Court could resolve the split if the Schaffners appealed, perhaps as soon as next year. The court is not required to hear an appeal, but often accepts cases when lower courts disagree on the law.

Chip Becker, a lawyer for the Schaffners, said his clients were disappointed with the decision and were reviewing their legal options, and that federal law should not preempt their failure-to-warn claim.

In a research note, Barclays analysts said "this ruling was not expected," and Bayer believed a positive Supreme Court resolution "could bring glyphosate litigation to an end."

The Supreme Court declined to hear Bayer's appeal from the San Francisco decision. Bayer has until Sept. 5 to appeal the Atlanta decision, court records show.

Bayer said it was pleased with Thursday's decision and looked forward to presenting its arguments to the Supreme Court, saying that court should "settle this important issue of law."

The German company has long maintained that Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate are safe.


SHARE SLUMP

Bayer has faced extensive litigation over Roundup, and through Thursday had seen its share price fall more than 73% since buying Monsanto for $63 billion in June 2018.

It settled much of the litigation for $10.9 billion in 2020, but still faces about 58,000 claims. Another 114,000 claims have been settled or rejected.

Though Bayer won 14 of 23 Roundup trials through July 23, one victory was overturned on appeal, and the losses saddled it with billions of dollars of damages awards.

The Schaffners settled with Bayer in September 2022, conditioned on Bayer being unable to convince courts that federal law preempted Pennsylvania's cancer warning.

Chagares said it did, and that this approach "best achieves Congress's stated aim of uniformity in pesticide labeling."

Roundup is among the most widely used weed killers in the United States. Bayer phased out sales for home use last year.

The case is Schaffner et al v Monsanto Corp, 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-3075.



Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York
Additional reporting by Brendan Pierson and Ludwig Burger
Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Frances Kerry

</body></html>

Ansvarsfriskrivning: XM Group-enheter tillhandahåller sin tjänst enbart för exekvering och tillgången till vår onlinehandelsplattform, som innebär att en person kan se och/eller använda tillgängligt innehåll på eller via webbplatsen, påverkar eller utökar inte detta, vilket inte heller varit avsikten. Denna tillgång och användning omfattas alltid av i) villkor, ii) riskvarningar och iii) fullständig ansvarsfriskrivning. Detta innehåll tillhandahålls därför uteslutande som allmän information. Var framför allt medveten om att innehållet på vår onlinehandelsplattform varken utgör en uppmaning eller ett erbjudande om att ingå några transaktioner på de finansiella marknaderna. Handel på alla finansiella marknader involverar en betydande risk för ditt kapital.

Allt material som publiceras på denna sida är enbart avsett för utbildnings- eller informationssyften och innehåller inte – och ska inte heller anses innehålla – rådgivning och rekommendationer om finansiella frågor, investeringsskatt eller handel, dokumentation av våra handelskurser eller ett erbjudande om, eller en uppmaning till, en transaktion i finansiella instrument eller oönskade finansiella erbjudanden som är riktade till dig.

Tredjepartsinnehåll, liksom innehåll framtaget av XM såsom synpunkter, nyheter, forskningsrön, analyser, kurser, andra uppgifter eller länkar till tredjepartssajter som återfinns på denna webbplats, tillhandahålls i befintligt skick, som allmän marknadskommentar, och utgör ingen investeringsrådgivning. I den mån som något innehåll tolkas som investeringsforskning måste det noteras och accepteras att innehållet varken har varit avsett som oberoende investeringsforskning eller har utarbetats i enlighet med de rättsliga kraven för att främja ett sådant syfte, och därför är att betrakta som marknadskommunikation enligt tillämpliga lagar och föreskrifter. Se till så att du har läst och förstått vårt meddelande om icke-oberoende investeringsforskning och riskvarning om ovannämnda information, som finns här.

Riskvarning: Ditt kapital riskeras. Hävstångsprodukter passar kanske inte alla. Se vår riskinformation.