UK budget watchdog adopting 'trust but verify' approach to finance ministry
Adds detail on roles of officials and ministers in paragraph 11
By David Milliken
LONDON, Nov 5 (Reuters) -Britain's Office for Budget Responsibility has shifted from an approach of trust towards the finance ministry to one of "trust but verify" after inaccurate spending forecasts provided before March's budget statement underthe lastConservative government.
Last week the OBR said the Treasury had failed to share information about large upward pressures on day-to-day spending and unusually high spending from emergency reserves.
"The way I would characterise it is that we are moving from a system of trust to a system of 'trust but verify'," OBR Chair Richard Hughes told the House of Commons' Treasury Committee on Tuesday.
"We want to ... make sure that we're satisfied that what happened, the failure of oversight that very clearly happened in March, doesn't happen again."
New Labour finance minister Rachel Reeves said the previous government, which oversaw the last budget, had left a 22 billion pound ($29 billion) black hole, requiring her to raise taxes by much more than she had planned before July's election.
The Conservatives say most of this hole reflects Labour's choices on public-sector pay or temporary overspending that is routinely recouped in a normal financial year.
However, the OBR said that if finance ministry officials had been more open in the run-up to the March budget - as they had been in the past - it would have forecast materially higher spending for the current financial year.
"There were about 9.5 billion pounds worth of net pressures on departments' budgets which they did not disclose to us as part of our usual budget preparation process ..., which under the law ... they should have done," Hughes said.
From now on the OBR will ask for a more detailed breakdown of the finance ministry's spending forecasts, he said.
Lawmakers would need to ask the finance ministry at a hearing on Wednesday why it had failed to provide the necessary information, Hughes said. "There may have been a misunderstanding of how the law ought to be interpreted."
Britain's finance ministry did not have an immediate comment on Hughes' criticism. The OBR said it did not consult former finance minister Jeremy Hunt, who oversaw March's budget, as the review looked into the actions of officials, not ministers.
($1 = 0.7702 pounds)
Reporting by David Milliken and Suban Abdulla; editing by Sachin Ravikumar and Mark Heinrich
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
