US sues Norfolk Southern to stop delays on Amtrak passenger route
Adds no immediate Norfolk Southern comment, background, comments from DOT, AG in paragraphs 2-10
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) -The U.S. Justice Department filed a civil suit on Tuesday against Norfolk Southern NSC.N alleging that the transport company is delaying passenger trains on Amtrak’s Crescent Route between New York City and New Orleans in violation of federal law.
Norfolk did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Biden administration has made boosting passenger rail service and high-speed rail project a top priority. Congress approved $66 billion in funding for rail projects as part of a massive infrastructure bill in 2021, with $22 billion dedicated to Amtrak and $36 billion made available for grants.
Amtrak wants to break even and double total ridership to 66 million by 2040. Its passenger numbers grew 45% from 2003 to 2019 to 32.3 million.
Amtrak said last year that half of the 46 states it serves have minimal service. Florida, Ohio and Arizona, the Mountain West and Gulf Coast are served by long distance trains that provide no more than one round trip a day.
The 1,377-mile passenger line stops at 33 towns and cities and Norfolk Southern controls 1,140 miles of rail line on the Crescent Route and handles dispatching for all trains along that segment, including freight trains it operates.
The Justice Department said 266,000 passengers traveled on the Crescent Route last year and only 24% of southbound Crescent Route passenger trains traveling on Norfolk Southern-controlled track arrived at their destination on time.
Federal law requires Norfolk Southern to give Amtrak passenger trains preference over freight trains but the Justice Department said Norfolk Southern regularly fails to do so, "leading to widespread delays that harm and inconvenience train passengers, negatively affect Amtrak’s financial performance, and impede passenger rail transportation."
"Americans should not experience travel delays because rail carriers break the law,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said "for half a century, federal law has required freight rail companies to give Amtrak passenger rail service preference on their tracks — yet compliance with this important law has been uneven at best."
Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Mark Porter and Aurora Ellis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
