XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

US panel appoints New Mexico judge to hear shale-oil antitrust lawsuits



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US panel appoints New Mexico judge to hear shale-oil antitrust lawsuits</title></head><body>

By Mike Scarcella

Aug 1 (Reuters) -A U.S. judicial panel said on Thursday that a series of related lawsuits accusing shale oil producers Hess, Pioneer Natural Resources and six others of a price-fixing scheme will be grouped together and assigned to a U.S. federal judge in New Mexico.

The order by the federal Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation designated the New Mexico federal court over other venues, including Texas and Nevada, where lawsuits also had been filed in recent months.

More than a dozen lawsuits allege Hess, Pioneer Natural Resources, Diamondback Energy and other producers conspired to curb shale oil output, which has led to higher prices for products including gasoline, diesel fuel, commercial marine fuel and heating oil. The first lawsuit was filed in Nevada in January.

Hess, Pioneer Natural Resources and Diamondback either declined to comment or did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Exxon Mobil acquired Pioneer in May.

The defendants have said the plaintiffs' complaints fail to state any claim under antitrust law and should be dismissed.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Garcia in Albuquerque, who was confirmed to the court last year, was selected to oversee the litigation. Garcia is a former chief of staff to Democratic New Mexico Governor Michelle Grisham.

The oil companies had recommended the Midland/Odessa division of the Western District of Texas for the consolidated forum.

Warren Burns, an attorney for some of the plaintiffs who had argued for the selection of New Mexico, said on Thursday that the state was “the right venue for this case.”

The judicial panel said they selected New Mexico in part because the plaintiffs allege that much of the shale oil production at issue occurs there. The court also said the venue was convenient for some of the defendants.


Read more:

Chevron's $53 billion deal for Hess faces new delay over arbitration schedule

Former Pioneer CEO urges FTC to withdraw ban on his Exxon board inclusion

Drivers sue US shale oil producers over alleged price-fixing scheme



Reporting by Mike Scarcella

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.