Civic, environmental groups sue New York governor for halting congestion charge
By Jonathan Allen
NEW YORK, July 25 (Reuters) -Two lawsuits accusing New York Governor Kathy Hochul of violating state law with her decision to halt the implementation of a congestion charge to drive into parts of Manhattan were filed on Thursday by commuter and environmental advocacy groups.
Hochul, a Democrat who had previously advocated for the congestion charge, announced in June that she would "indefinitely pause" the charge, just weeks before it was due to come into effect. She said the charge would place economic stress on some middle-class households.
Most New York City residents do not own private vehicles, and nearly 90% of people who commute into the Manhattan central business district for work do so using public transit or by bike or on foot, according to state data.
One of the lawsuits, filed by the City Club of New York and two Manhattan residents alleges that Hochul does not have the authority to "single-handedly" block the implementation of New York's 2019 MTA Reform and Traffic Mobility Act, which mandated a tolling program to enter New York City's central business district.
"Governor Hochul's purported 'pause' of the (congestion charge) is, quite literally, lawless," the plaintiffs said in their lawsuit filed in the New York Supreme Court in Manhattan. They said Hochul's "decision to upend years of work has caused widespread chaos."
Under the plan developed by the state-controlled Metropolitan Transportation Authority, drivers would have to pay up to $15 to drive into Manhattan below 60th Street; a return trip on the New York City subway or bus system costs about $6. The plan was modeled on similar charges in force for years in London, Singapore and other cities, and would have been the first of its kind in the U.S.
"Get in line," Maggie Halley, a spokesperson for Hochul, said in a statement in response to the lawsuits. "There are now 11 separate congestion pricing lawsuits filed by groups trying to weaponize the judicial system to score political points, but Governor Hochul remains focused on what matters: funding transit, reducing congestion, and protecting working New Yorkers."
She did not respond to questions about the lawsuits' contention that Hochul's decision had violated state laws. The MTA did not respond to a request for comment.
The congestion charge was expected to reduce vehicle traffic and air pollution and generate $16.5 billion for the MTA's capital plan to maintain and upgrade the city's aging subway system.
Last month, the MTA said it was forced to suspend its capital maintenance and upgrade plans until the state found a replacement source of funding, which Hochul has said she is trying to do.
The second of the lawsuits, which was filed by the advocacy groups Riders Alliance, the Sierra Club and the New York City Environmental Justice Alliance, accuses Hochul of violating New Yorkers' right to clean air established by the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act and a state constitutional amendment made in 2021.
"If her action is not reversed, hard-working New Yorkers on their way home after a long day, will experience increasing service cuts, gridlock, air quality alerts, and inaccessible stations," New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, a Democrat who helped organize the lawsuits, said in a statement.
Reporting by Jonathan Allen; Editing by Daniel Wallis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
