California aims to tackle pump spikes by requiring gas reserves
By Timothy Gardner
Aug 15 (Reuters) -California Governor Gavin Newsom proposed a plan on Thursday requiring oil refiners to maintain minimum reserves of gasoline in an effort to prevent price spikes.
The California Energy Commission said that on 63 days last year California refiners maintained less than 15 days of supply of gasoline, a situation that it said spiked prices and cost drivers $650 million.
“Price spikes at the pump are profit spikes for Big Oil. Refiners should be required to plan ahead and backfill supplies to keep prices stable, instead of playing games to earn even more profits," Newsom, a Democrat, said in a release.
It was unclear when the plan could take effect and Newsom's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Under the plan, which industry has criticized as attacking producers, California’s oil refiners would be required to demonstrate resupply plans that are adequate to address losses in production when their plants are undergoing maintenance work.
California found that in 2023 gasoline prices spiked largely due to refineries going offline without adequately planning to backfill supplies.
The plan comes three months after the U.S. Department of Energy sold its 1 million barrel Northeast gasoline reserve, which Washington created after 2014's Superstorm Sandy left motorists scrambling for fuel supplies. The U.S. Congress mandated the sale after the reserve was criticized as expensive to maintain and for not increasing energy security.
California, the most populous U.S. state, is home to some of the country's highest average gasoline prices and has had a fraught relationship with oil companies. The state has ambitious targets for electric car adoption and is the only one with a waiver from the federal environmental regulator to set its own vehicle emissions regulations.
This month, U.S. oil company Chevron CVX.N said it was moving its headquarters to Houston from San Ramon, California.
Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president and CEO of the Western States Petroleum Association said Newsom's plan was "nothing more than a political attack on consumers and our industry."
"To impose new operational mandates on energy producers based on such falsehoods is regulatory malpractice, and ignores the logistical challenges and costs associated with such a plan," she said.
Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by Josie Kao
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
