XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

What went wrong for Nestle CEO Mark Schneider



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>What went wrong for Nestle CEO Mark Schneider</title></head><body>

By Richa Naidu

LONDON, Aug 26 (Reuters) -Mark Schneider, Nestle's recently ousted CEO, steered the world's biggest food maker through the COVID-19 pandemic, grew margins despite a subsequent supply chain crunch, and pulled off a historic reorganisation.

So when did he lose the board's faith?

While Nestle declined to comment on the nature of his departure when announcing it on Thursday, and Schneider did not respond to a request to do so, three sources told Reuters on Friday that the executive had been axed.

One source said the decision was reached after Nestle's board became increasingly concerned about weak sales growth. They also cited worries about slowing product development, with new and revamped products taking longer to be devised and rolled out.

"Two years ago, Mark Schneider could do nothing wrong; now he seems to get it all wrong," Bernstein analyst Bruno Monteyne said, flagging a drop in Nestle's stock, which has slid roughly 30% since its pandemic high in early 2022.

But, "is that a good reason to break up with a CEO that was only two years ago feted as the best CEO in the sector?" Monteyne asked.

Schneider, 58, in 2017 became the first company outsider to lead the maker of KitKat bars and Nescafe coffee in nearly a century. Its stock peaked during his tenure, tapping a record of 129.5 Swiss francs ($152.73) at the start of 2022.

That year, he led an overhaul of the company, changing its executive board to align with a new geographic structure.

Where rivals like PepsiCo PEP.O and Unilever ULVR.L were not able to sustain operating margin growth in the seven years to 2023, Schneider grew Nestle's to 17.3% from 16.5%.

This feat was particularly remarkable, given the hit industry margins took during the pandemic.

But the board's concerns about sluggish sales volumes and underinvestment are not unfounded, and have been raised repeatedly in calls with analysts and investors in recent years.


SLOW GROWTH, INNOVATION

Nestle has posted patchy sales growth through Schneider's nearly eight-year tenure in comparison to some ofits competitors, losing the momentum it gained during the pandemic by alienating shoppers with too-high prices in 2023.

It and the rest of the consumer goods industry hiked prices dramatically in the face of sky-rocketing supply chain and raw materials costs, fuelling a global cost-of-living crisis.

In response to a question during his final post-results call in July, Schneider acknowledged that supply chain constraints in 2022 had left "less energy" for innovation, which he said may have inadvertently helped private label, or store-brand, goods compete.

This was a new position - Schneider had previously brushed off the threat posed to Nestle by private label competition, saying that while the company had seen "limited" signs of that, it was likely to be temporary. "I'm not concerned," he said at the time.

But in the year to mid-June, according to Nielsen data analysed by Barclays, Nestle's grocery store market share had fallen dramatically in Europe from the year before and been deeply hurt in the U.S.

Other companies like PepsiCo and Unilever also lost market share and sales volumes due to higher prices. However, these other major players have in recent quarters managed to boost volumes again, garnering praise from analysts for supporting their comebacks with innovation and strong advertising.

Nestle was initially less able to slow its price hikes and even when it did last year, volumes - or 'real internal growth'- stayed weak.

Schneider's step back on marketing in 2022 has also been criticized repeatedly by investors and analysts, despite his renewed push for advertising since.

He has said himself that marketing was "quite muted" in 2022 due to supply chain and capacity constraints.

His replacement, Laurent Freixe, a 62-year-old Frenchman, started working for Nestle 40 years ago in marketing roles before moving up the ranks to executive positions.

He is seen as a food industry insider, with a broad network of executives and experts from within and outside the Swiss group. He has immediately pledged to focus Nestle on organic growth rather than acquisitions.

($1 = 0.8479 Swiss francs)


Nestle's European, U.S. market share gutted https://reut.rs/4dWopjc

Shoppers continue to shun Nestle after high prices https://reut.rs/4dXlcAi

Nestle sales growth lags U.S. rivals in Schneider's tenure https://reut.rs/4dD63V0


Reporting by Richa Naidu; Editing by Matt Scuffham and Jan Harvey

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.